EP mass shock "potency" problem in RNG
Could you PLEASE look at your AI's use of "potency" in arena? Every time I go up against an EP lead, that EP stuns 4 or 5 of my team and when my mass shock is done, I mostly stun 1 or 2. My potency ...
Forum Discussion
"Drazhar;c-1567737" wrote:
Powering up defending teams is not a solution to overcome AI's stewpidity (dude, this can't be a bad word. We're not in a nursing home). Just upgrade your AI, CG.
"VonZant;c-1567736" wrote:"leef;c-1567730" wrote:"VonZant;c-1567715" wrote:"TVF;c-1567705" wrote:
What exactly would be the motivation for CG to give the AI an advantage and then lie about it anyway?
To get people to buy more characters and gear? Not saying that is happening. I dont think it is. But there is a simple answer to more than 99% of business related questions. ;)
That's a possible explanation, but then there's the fact that the AI is rubbish. It doesn't target low health enemies, doesn't focus fire, pretty much doesn't use basic strategy. So why make the AI weak, but do give the AI an RNG advantage? That just doesn't make sense.
I'm reasonably sure they made the AI weak intentionally because it's more fun to win on offence.
I agree with you. In fact they have stated they made it weak in some situations (zFinn Resisistance for one). I can understand the reasons. BUT - With the advent of TW I think they should reexamine it. We spend money investing in the teams so they can be played by an intentionally dimwitted ai. Run Bossk lead BH through GW - even if there is no taunting tank they show no preference of attacking the weakest enemy to activate his contract. Even though that is smartedt move anyway. Could stand some updating.
all i can say is be carefull what you wish for. It may result in loads of losses on offense.
