Is this normal?

"littleMAC77;c-1909942" wrote:

"jhbuchholz;c-1909927" wrote:

"StarSon;c-1909924" wrote:

"littleMAC77;c-1909921" wrote:

"littleMAC77;c-1909906" wrote:
Perhaps by calling it in as a reinforcement it hasn't triggered the unique. Had Biggs been debuffed since the Falcon was called in?

I just confirmed by doing some manual fleet battles, if you call the Falcon in as a reinforcement it will not clear existing debuffs on a rebel ally. I am not sure if it cleared any debuffs after reinforcement as I don't believe my biggs was ever debuffed again.

Zvezda you should enter this as a bug report since the text does not say it will not cleanse existing debuffs when used as a reinforcement.

Seems to be both WAI and WAD. Just because it doesn't do what you want doesn't mean it's wrong.

Edit: we can verify in the .gg mechanics:

Add 1 (additive) to value on blackboard uniqueability_millenniumfalcon01_debuff_count

And

Context Returned: Target(s) that had their blackboard modified

They must gain 3 unique debuffs while the HMF is active or it can't do anything.

It can be WAI and WAD (and I happen to agree that this is probably the case) and still be poorly worded. I think CG has proven this to be true time and time again. For instance, CG could have coded the ability to only trigger when another Rebel ally is inflicted with 3 or more different debuffs at the same time (as in from the same action) and it would fit the description.

The wording in descriptions across the board leaves a lot to be desired and looks to be a low effort high value QoL deliverable. With swgoh.gg showing the mechanics they could even crowdsource it.

This. It seems to be a small bug/issue with the wording of the unique, not with the actual mechanics themselves. If they just threw in a "while the falcon is present" in the description it would clear up confusion

It does say, "when another rebel ally is inflicted..." , that is targeting the time the action takes place. If the falcon is not present at that time this would not take effect, but agreed that they could have worded this differently to cause less confusion. I often wonder if translations into other languages cause the unique way some things are worded.