LV/Maul [MERGE]

"biglippedbeast;c-2315884" wrote:

"Legend91;c-2315347" wrote:

"biglippedbeast;c-2315334" wrote:

"Legend91;c-2315122" wrote:

"biglippedbeast;c-2315106" wrote:

"dgree;c-2314344" wrote:
Didn't read the comments here or anything, but I came in to ask about LV/Maul more generally:

Is there something wrong with LV? Every whale in my arena shard with LV (they also have relic maul), uses JMK. And all but one of those LV owners has quit.

I assume the issue is mostly the players quitting due to conquest, but it seems like they're not interested even in playing with their new toys.

Put it to you this way, played correctly a mid relic jmk mirror can beat a full r8 jmk squad 100% of the time; my r7 lv/maul squad loses 100% of the time vs r8 jmk team and is a race against the clock against all others.

The team is BAD

Put it to you this way, you're just bad then as LV easily wins on offense.

In a top guild and perennial kyber member but I’m bad; yep checks out LV is a obviously a god king

Nice CD triangle and health primaries on your LV. Nice offense set and health primaries on your Maul. Nice protection primaries and 2x defense sets on your RG.
Maybe you should reach out to some modding experts in your top guild.

And I never said that he is the "king" - I was one of the first people here that posted feedback based on arena testing and pointed out that he has several flaws including his defensive viability and that his ult just feels lackluster. However when someone claims that he "loses 100% of the time" against JMKs then that's a players fault as LV is consistently winning on offense, there are even reports of LV beating JMK 3v5.

Maul is modded for mando team for tw; I said he lost against r8 jmk teams not anything else; reading comprehension?

For some reason when checking your profile I completely missed that your LV doesn't even have his ult (which I took as a given).
So you're arguing that your non-ult LV (who's a mastery focused GL that NEEDS his ult) is bad? Amazing.