Malevolence STILL useless?! Really?!?

"thecarterologist958;c-2057499" wrote:

"Woodroward;c-2057484" wrote:


I was using logic for one thing I stated. To back that up I used supporting details including a statement by the devs.

To say I was wrong about the statement by the devs one would need to find the statement by the devs. That's pretty cut and dry. I had initially said that I wasn't going to look up any of my sources for anybody.

What you and dude did was disproved what the devs said. Same as many people before you in many threads on this forum. Good job. Has nothing to do with any of my assertions and was therefore a misconceived rambling sham of a counterargument that really had nothing to do with me and also happened to be spreading misinformation based on said misconception due to it.

Logic must be backed up with facts. Questioning the facts means looking into the facts. Something that no one here did except @EventineElessedil . Good job dude!

Actually, you said sources were useless after I had provided mine, and you agreed of your own accord on the source you then claimed was useless, which logically suggests you believed it until shown you were wrong, then you claimed you didn't say it so knew it was false, which logically suggests you were changing your stance to pretend you were in the right. Don't believe me, prove me wrong by checking the messages. I don't have to provide them as sources are

"Woodroward;c-2056626" wrote:

immaterial.

and if you want me to do it I should tell you to

"Woodroward;c-2056626" wrote:


shove sources somewhere dark

So if you want to say I'm wrong, check my facts. I guess I'm right until then?