"RAYRAY;718791" wrote:
"No_Try;718785" wrote:
Here is a shortlist of the arguments that keeps the various topics on roids alive:
- Roids can't beat Rex teams.
- Roids can't beat this particular team I find especially good
- Ai...duh
- Roids are bad on defense
- Roids will be dead soon, if you invest in them you'll be out of circulation by the time next meta arrives (why?)
- You can't autowin with roids.
- If you play roids there's no place in the team to put anything else.
- You are an exception to the rule/you are a whale.
All of them are proven otherwise, hypothetical situations hard to test or can't be debunked simply because they don't provide a rationale or weren't even debated otherwise.
My existence here is to debunk the last bit, since it's impossible for the op to roll back his resources. It also happens to be that I play roids in a different way than he does, which is also counterintuitive to most since I try not to use HK. I'm only a consistenly playing f2p roider that's able to place top in arena, I'm not a special snowflake. There are countless other players with plethora of roid blends who does what I do that I saw first hand.
Forgot one:
- Nobody cares about the OP's droids or yours beating anyone on offense.
You and many seem to care enough to comment. Shouldn't be that hard to scroll through.
