"Sucaliaric;c-1906630" wrote:
"bisto_760;c-1906351" wrote:
Offense set if character:
-doesnt/can't crit hit.
-primarialy uses SPECIAL damage.
Crit damage set if character:
-can crit/good crit chance.
-uses PHYSICAL damage.
That's basically it. If you look in the stats of a character you'll see the physical damage # is lower than the special damage number. But the physical damage crit chance is higher than the special damage crit chance. So...physical damage is lower damage/higher crit chance and special damage is higher damage/lower crit chance. Grand master yoda uses(should be) an offence set. Ezra's uses a crit damage set.
And before someone jumps in with an exception, YES there are some situations where either will work. My explanation is intended to help people understand the principles.
Why does whether the primary attack is special or physical matter for crit damage versus offense sets? Is it just because of the different crit chances?
exactly @Sucaliaric the heuristic bisto suggested works well because most special damage dealing characters have a low special crit chance and visa verse for physical damage dealers.
There are plenty of edge cases as bisto mentioned. My favorite is GMY who has a low special crit chance but when in a revan squad as a metirc (bad word) ton of CC in battle so CD set is more sensible... unless trying to kill a squad with jolee and GK who have a metric (bad word) ton of crit avoidance which makes offense mose sensible. But it's a bit of a subjective judgement call at the end of the day.