7 years ago
Ventress vs. MT Lead
Hi everyone,
I'm really hesitating between the two and would be really grateful if you could share what you believe are the pros and cons of each.
My shard is pretty mixed atm with CLS, GZarriss, Rey, a few MT and a couple of Ventress leads.
I have 3, soon to be 4 zetas, saved and would like to know the priority order with whichever team you reckon I should pursue.
I have a MT lead, Daka, AV, NA, NZ team sharing my payout and I would like to maybe have a NS team that defends well against that comp. I'm under the impression Ventress does but I'm wondering if going AV lead would maybe weaken me against other team comps such as General Zarriss.
I've recently seen a move towards AV lead, MT, Daka, Zombie and Zarriss or GK as 5th. I get Zarriss (btw is it a good all around team on defense?) but fail to see why GK besides for the crit damage immunity.
Last, given the bug around MT lead and TM gain being corrected, is it substantially improving her lead?
Thanks a lot for the help!
I'm really hesitating between the two and would be really grateful if you could share what you believe are the pros and cons of each.
My shard is pretty mixed atm with CLS, GZarriss, Rey, a few MT and a couple of Ventress leads.
I have 3, soon to be 4 zetas, saved and would like to know the priority order with whichever team you reckon I should pursue.
I have a MT lead, Daka, AV, NA, NZ team sharing my payout and I would like to maybe have a NS team that defends well against that comp. I'm under the impression Ventress does but I'm wondering if going AV lead would maybe weaken me against other team comps such as General Zarriss.
I've recently seen a move towards AV lead, MT, Daka, Zombie and Zarriss or GK as 5th. I get Zarriss (btw is it a good all around team on defense?) but fail to see why GK besides for the crit damage immunity.
Last, given the bug around MT lead and TM gain being corrected, is it substantially improving her lead?
Thanks a lot for the help!