Yoda Immediate bonus turn not immediate

"BobcatSkywalker;c-2172748" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2172673" wrote:

"Bulldog1205;c-2172660" wrote:
Things still aren’t working correctly with bonus turns. Speed isn’t acting as the tiebreaker. For example, Yoda will (or at least can) trigger a bonus turn from GG who will jump Yoda’s bonus turn despite being slower, but if Anakin’s bonus turn is triggered the same way it won’t (or doesn’t always) jump Yoda. I’ve also had Malak continue to jump in between Anakin and Padme bonus turns even if Padme is faster.

when Yoda takes his turn he goes to 0 TM and gains a bonus turn, which gives him 0 overflow. any toon who has a bonus turn triggered by the first attack will have X TM except in specific situations where they have 0 TM. that toon gains a bonus turn due to GMY and now has 100% TM and X overshoot. that toon wins step one, which will not cause it to step into the measure of speed (step 2)

the first check is TM overflow, second is speed. if the decision is made based on overflow, then yes speed will not be the contributing factor to the decision.

Kyno if what u say is true it seems giving Yoda 200% or 1000% turn meter would fix the issue of his ability not working as written — Yoda not taking an immediate turn.

Of course that would require an update to make the game function as described (immediate bonus turn) but making Yoda gain 200% turn meter can't be that much more complicated than opening a ticket with EA to rewrite Yoda's ability since the devs broke his bonus turn and don't want to fix it.

Instead of nerfing Yoda and rewriting the description why don't they just make his ability gain 200% or 1000% turn meter so Yoda gets his bonus turn since that's what his ability clearly states will happen. Seems simple, is it not?

If we start rewriting kits because devs broke something that used to work and they are too lazy to fix the error they made... Well that can't be good for player morale. Why invest in something if it's just gonna get rewritten when the ability you invested into is broken by a future update.

I don't get why they take the easy way out. This isn't even that hard to fix.

he was never intended to take anything other than the bonus turn we have all come to know and love. the wording was just used "at the time" because this was a new thing and thats how it was worded.

the intent was for it to be a bonus turn, there is no "fix" for this. I understand where you are coming from and if they wanted to give him the "thrawn treatment", they could, but that was not the design intent, despite the wording.

this is not broken, nor has it ever been.