Punishing One still gives Bonus Protection when not all allies are Bounty Hunter

This is really something that should be, at the least, passed along to update the verbiage of one or both of these ships as having two abilities worded almost identically but functioning differently is a terrible user experience.

"At the start of battle, if Punishing One is deployed and all allies are Bounty Hunters (excluding the Capital Ship)" and "At the start of battle, if all allies are Empire, Inquisitorius, or Sith" not behaving the same is the epitome of terrible writing and user experience.

Even the code seems almost identical:

The "targeting_sets_exclude" is the only difference between the two, but it's far from descriptive of what it's checking for and may be what is causing the two to behave differently.

The fact that these two unique abilities function differently shouldn't be something that you have to wonder about in game when it happens, see they're essentially identical on the best resource to check on this sort of thing (.gg) and then have to come here to the technical issues board to find out that they are apparently both working correctly while being labeled as identical everywhere else.

Could you make this more obvious in the ability description then? such as "if all ships not in reinforcements are bounty hunter". TIE Advanced has "At the start of battle, if all allies are Empire, Inquisitorius, or Sith and TIE/IN Interceptor is in reinforcements, allied Empire Capital Ship cooldowns are reduced by 1 (including Call Reinforcement)." however, if there is a ship in reinforcements that isnt any of those tags then it breaks?