Forum Discussion

Dqrkful's avatar
Dqrkful
New Novice
3 months ago

The Sims 1 & 2 Get Modern Updates and a Re-Release, But Sims 3 Gets Nothing

So EA updates The Sims 1 and 2 to run on modern hardware, fixes bugs, and now re-releases them for $30 (plus a Sims 4 kit, because of course they had to throw that in). Meanwhile, The Sims 3 one of the most beloved yet notoriously unstable games in the franchise gets a single Alder Lake patch and is otherwise abandoned.

They’re putting in the effort to make their oldest games playable on Windows 10/11, but they can’t be bothered to fix Sims 3’s memory issues, stuttering, or overall performance? We’re still forced to rely on mods and external fixes just to get the game to run properly, and they still sell it at full price on EA App/Steam without any real support.

It’s frustrating seeing EA put effort into these re-releases while Sims 3 arguably their most ambitious game is left to rot. If they can fix up The Sims 1 and 2, why can’t they do the same for Sims 3?

8 Replies

  • Dqrkful  Not to defend EA, but Sims 1 was far more unplayable on current hardware than Sims 3 is.  The latter actually runs out of the box, maybe not always that well, but it does start and load and (usually) manage to stay running without crashing for a while.  Also, the game isn't "full price" and hasn't been for a while.  Expansions were originally more than $20 U.S., and when on sale, EPs and SPs are $8-10.

  • Dqrkful's avatar
    Dqrkful
    New Novice
    3 months ago

    I'm saying if 1 and 2 gets updates why not 3?

  • Dqrkful  My guess is because Sims 1 and 2 needed updates to be viable products again, and Sims 3 does not.  EA is still selling it as-is, so why spend the dev time and money (now) to update it?

  • Dqrkful's avatar
    Dqrkful
    New Novice
    3 months ago

    Just because EA can still sell The Sims 3 'as-is' doesn't mean it wouldn’t benefit from updates. The game has major performance issues, even on modern hardware, and mods are doing what EA won’t. If they’re still making money from it, why not invest a little to make it run better? It would keep players happy and likely boost sales in the long run.

  • mmoblitz's avatar
    mmoblitz
    Seasoned Scout
    3 months ago

    Just my opinion, but it would probably take releasing a 64 bit version of the game.  I'm down for that, but unless Microsoft stops all support for 32 bit OS then it's not likely to happen.  I'm sure people would flock to Sims 3 if that was the case and they would probably lose more sales of sims 4 than they would get from sims 3.

  • Maybe they are working on Sims3, but its not ready yet?    I mean, they did provide the Alder Lake CPU patch, and they didn't have to.   I have to admit I'm shocked they updated Sims and Sims2, though.  What a surprise!

  • koTTak98  It's not literally unplayable, just far from ideal, without NRaas mods.  The original Sims 1 is literally unplayable on many modern computers.  The original Sims 2 has a graphical glitch that makes the game effectively unplayable right from the start.  Sims 3 crashes some, occasionally a lot, but it's not at the same level as the others.

About The Sims 3 General Discussion

Connect with fellow Simmers and share your experiences in The Sims 3 official community.6,576 PostsLatest Activity: 5 minutes ago