"MidnightAura;c-17229557" wrote:
"NorthDakotaGamer;c-17229534" wrote:
"doublenoodles;c-17229508" wrote:
"NorthDakotaGamer;c-17228377" wrote:
"Wulfsimmer;c-17228372" wrote:
"NorthDakotaGamer;c-17228361" wrote:
I actually would have preferred the "pride content" to be in a downloadable pack, similar to the holiday, guitar, and too large picture frame. That would solve a multitude of complaints, because it would only be downloaded if it was desired content. If history is of any indication, I will be forced to download yet another mod to make my game playable.
Why not just...not use it? Some packs oppose my views but I am not frustrated over them. I use what I want.
It does not and never will fit my gameplay. Do I need to be more blunt?
Then don't play sims 4, simple.
Isn't the all sims games about the player ruling their own game? All these "cultural" and "social" agendas forced via free patches are against that aspect. It no longer is a sandbox style game when those are put in it.
Cultural items and LGBTQ+ are optional, if you don’t like them, don’t use them.
I'm compelled to point out that this is a common fallacy. Telling someone to that if they don't like content, then don't use said content is an attempt to shut down critical thinking, as the person you replied to presented, and doesn't address the issue at hand, such as people's problems with the hijab and the pride content. The point of criticism is to weigh the merits of whatever the party talks about. Using a blanket statement like "don't like them, don't use them" is an attempt to cover up and/or dismiss the issue and doesn't allow said merits to be weighed.
Let them.
