Get Famous: Happy/Unhappy w/Number of Lots?

I always need more space anywhere I can get. DSV isn't enough, but it'll have to do.

I’m disappointed that’s it only has 11 lots, As I said it’s a bit paradoxical for a world based on LA to be small !!

Also I don’t get why we have two lounge bars but no movie theater.....

They need a West Del Sol Valley map. 6 residential lots mean your adult children and yourself own the city. Think about that because 8 Sims to a household.

I remember a Guru saying Del Sol Valley would be big. :neutral: The world feels like a lot of wasted potential and it looks big but is relatively tiny compared to the Windenburg, BB, SM, etc. I'm disappointed.

No, I'm not happy with this. There's barely any space to build anything. And their excuse about "performance issues" is absurd. How is adding in 2-3 extra lots too much for a computer, even an older computer? I think they just ran out of time.

"AprilDawn;c-16792602" wrote:
In reference to Kate's comment:
Well - if it is getting too hard to expand this game - then maybe it is time to end it and move onto one that can be. We could build our own worlds in Sims 2 and 3! Either that or charge a lot less for packs because we sure are getting a lot less.

Agreed! Might as well just end the series if the game can't handle 2-3 extra lots! I didn't realize a game could be that unstable :/

Born and raised in LA at first I was like nooooo! I want more lots! Especially in the cheaper district, I forget the name I would have liked 4 or 5 lots. In Starlight 5 and maybe 4 in the rich area.

Very nice world

You know, if they took out some of the empty shell lots, we would probably be able to have them to be used on. DSV is 20% buildable and 80% fluff. This world is as fake as the actual Hollywood.

It sounds like the decision to make all worlds accessible in a single save game, rather than a save set in a dedicated world as in TS3, has effectively kneecapped future world size. That seems to demonstrate poor forward planning at the time of the game's original design.

I would be a little less annoyed if they had a CAW tool that I could use to build my own larger world. As it is, I will be stuck with their ever-shrinking worlds. All the background decor in the world means nothing when your world only fits 6 households.

What a major disappointment.

"bizuktag;c-16792762" wrote:
It sounds like the decision to make all worlds accessible in a single save game, rather than a save set in a dedicated world as in TS3, has effectively kneecapped future world size. That seems to demonstrate poor forward planning at the time of the game's original design.

I would be a little less annoyed if they had a CAW tool that I could use to build my own larger world. As it is, I will be stuck with their ever-shrinking worlds. All the background decor in the world means nothing when your world only fits 6 households.

What a major disappointment.

Exactly this and situations like this also suck for those of us who'd like to stick to one world. For example, I'd like to solely use Brindleton Bay but I can't for long before everyone becomes related. While I appreciate being able to easily switch between the worlds on a single save, it's clear now that this might start affecting new worlds.

I said this some years ago, but without a CAW tool, we're constantly depending on EA for new worlds, whether from boredom or from running out of space, or whatever it may be. And then what happens when the game inevitably comes to an end? In Sims 2/3 new worlds from the community are still being published, or I can easily go use the appropriate tools and conjure up my own. But without a CAW tool for Sims 4, there's no longevity or rather a long after-life. - and then situations like this crop up.

I enjoy Sims 4 but stuff like this will always bug me.