Forum Discussion
atreya33
2 years agoSeasoned Ace
"Chicklet453681;c-18235737" wrote:"Loanet;c-18235411" wrote:
You know, Pixelade said recently that Sequoica looked huge and beautiful and he bet that the Devs had great fun building it. And I looked at all those empty shells and I thought, "But isn't it US who is supposed to have great fun building it?"
If you were talking about any other Sims version, then I would say yes, yes it is!
But this is TS4 we're talking about. I've always said this is not the player's game, this is the dev's game and you either play how they want you to, or you go back to an earlier version.
I can't stand the limitations of this version, seriously. A big huge world with a ton of empty fake houses between the lots. Hateful!
They can make visually appealing worlds, I'll give them that. Just think if all of those fake houses were real lots we could build on! I'd be OK with even 1/2 of them being real lots. I don't mind the fake houses way off in the distance, but the fake houses and buildings in the in the neighborhoods and playable areas irk me to high heaven!
Did you see the "city" area? Literally there was a food stall and a piano out in the open, nothing else ...... Like a movie set ....just fake fake fake!
You are right about this being the dev's game when it comes to worlds. They create beautiful worlds but give us no options to make them our own.
It is a shame to have so many shell buildings in between lots. They determine how the world looks and force us to follow their style.
Also the worlds are so large that they feel empty with so few sims. It works for rural environments like Henford on Bagley but not for urban settings.
About The Sims 4 General Discussion
Join lively discussions, share tips, and exchange experiences on Sims 4 Expansion Packs, Game Packs, Stuff Packs & Kits.
33,177 PostsLatest Activity: 6 minutes agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 11 minutes ago
- 31 minutes ago
- 2 hours ago