"Writin_Reg;c-16467288" wrote:
"Lomelindi7;c-16467250" wrote:
VR doesn’t appeal to me right now. I am sort of hoping that that’s not the only option in the future. However, I wouldn’t be opposed to having sims with VR capabilities, so long as I could still play as normal if I so desired
I would guess they may be two separate games - as VR require much higher specs like 4 ports for one, an I-7 with at least a 4.5 ghz 8 core processor speeds, if I remember correctly my pc needed all 16 gigs of ram I have in it, and a 1070 preferably stand alone video card at least, and plus actual VR equipment and the app to run it. Just the VR stuff - one was 500 and the other was nearly a thousand.
Believe me I wanted to pay to get physically ill - well think I will go buy a ticket for the local carousel. It's much cheaper for 3 bucks. LOL. But truthfully I really think it would need two game versions or they would lose a lot of players if everyone needs a supercomputer just to play the sims - seeing it really doesn't have the kind of action and openness VR matter in providing you can even take VR.
I do suggest - trying it out before you consider spending that kind of money on a system for pc. Believe me it is much harder on you than on a system made for console. I learned the hardway thinking I'd have no issues - boy was I wrong.
I got a new computer a month ago and it’s pretty awesome and VR ready so I’m sure that part would be fine for me. But I get motion sick easily and so, like you, I might not really be able to handle VR games. I haven’t tried much yet but the bulky headsets also deter me