This is basically a scam....
Instead of moving forwards with the series expanding on the packs and adding more features of the same concept, we go backwards making them smaller and smaller for the same price. $40 F O U R T Y for ...
Forum Discussion
"luthienrising;c-15813045" wrote:"husseinandali;c-15813039" wrote:"luthienrising;c-15811125" wrote:
People were flipping out over $20 for "just" Vampires, until the pack came out... and was widely praised for being a deep handling of Vampires. Maybe having just two animal species in a Pets pack would mean we'd end up with better just-two-animals the way the Vampires pack worked. I'd be happy with $40 cats and dogs if they finally made it fun for me to play the way, finally, I find to be the case for vampires and toddlers (which didn't get squashed into the basegame in a lame way, like babies were). Quality over quantity. For me, personally, ten (or whatever) half-done animals for $40 would be more of a rip-off than two really well done, engaging animals for $40.
I remember in Sims 3 days we used to receive quality and quantity all together
If the pack is only cats and dogs I'm not interested
That first statement is a matter of opinion, and you'll see plenty of varying opinion on it. I personally always felt that Supernatural, Generations, Pets, Late Night, and Ambitions delivered more quantity than quality. They were all packs that I ended up finding shallow in actual gameplay. I definitely got my money's worth in quality from Sims 3 Seasons, though. I feel like the Sims teams have found a better quality groove lately, even if it's been at the cost of some quantity.
is it really, would you say those packs didn't have better content in regards to quality then any of the released "expansion packs".
Featured Places
