"Cemirror;c-17592617" wrote:
@simgirl1010 @babjayne My point, though, isn't about if the story is good, it's just that the judges have never been clear about what kind of story they're looking for. Just because something doesn't have a climax doesn't mean you can't enjoy it. But, for instance, while Team Llama's story doesn't really have a climax, the judges were perfectly happy with it, but - if I remember correctly - they criticized someone else's story in the first episode for not having a climax.
When there's such a lack of objectivity, it makes the judging very unsatisfying, almost untrustworthy. Just because I might like a story does not make it better than another one. Judging requires some criteria, and I think we should have known what that criteria was.
