"Nikkih;c-17797915" wrote:
"izecson;c-17797905" wrote:
"InuMiroLover;c-17797306" wrote:
"In today's news, do video games not only promote violence but also encourage players to hunt endangered species to extinction? Our biased, non fact checked sources all point to yes!"
Video game in the future will be censored pretty hard if everything involving animal species sparks controversy, imagine Red Dead Redemption 3 in the future without the ability to ride a horse or catch a fish, or hunt deer for skin and meat because its too cruel.
I just dont understand why some people take games too seriously, its entertainment, it's not real, I'm just going to say it the sensitivity those days are getting ridiculous, they need to grow a pair, sponsor a panda or a tiger or something in real life, make a difference outside the game, try correct what other humans have done, (were the most dangerous and worst animal in the planet, let's be real here)
True, I dislike that every little 'negative' thing have to be brought up, if the southern bluefin tuna is indeed endangered, and if some simmers who have no idea the status of the fish and actually wanted to create the real life recipe using the said fish im sure they would eventually realize the real tuna species is in endanger, you dont see endangered species being sold in very accessible places unless you insist to actually looking for them after finding out they are a protected species.
Games in 2000 where you can actually catch a Coelacanth fish did not spark any controversy and that fish existed since dinosaur age and is critically endangered.
