Help choosing a laptop for my 10 year old daughter
Hi everyone,
My daughter is about to turn 10 and she has saved up some money so we can buy a new laptop together with her. She saved up about 100 euros and we are planning on spending about 350 euros.
We have been to a store so she could pick a model she likes and she has picked a 14” Asus Vivobook. No matter what the laptop we are buying as one of those models. I have looked around and found 3 (actually 5) models that fall around our price range.
I would like your opinion whether these laptops will be able to play Sims 4 at 1080p at 60fps with low-medium settings. We would prefer to stay slightly under budget so we can buy her something else alongside the laptop. But if the lower end laptops will not cut it we will buy the more expensive models.
I know neither of these laptops are ideal gaming laptops, but outside of Sims 4 they are all more than capable to fulfill her needs.
We have the base game and Horse Ranch and are not planning to buy any additional packs for now.
1: 525 euros (slightly over budget)
I5-1235u, Intel Iris XE, 2x8gb DDR4, 512GB SSD
2: 450-480 euros (at top of the budget)
I3-1215u, UHD 64eu, 1x 8gb DDR4, 512GB SSD (can upgrade to 1x16gb DDR4)
3: 350-380 euros (lower end of the budget, we can buy her something additional)
I3-N305, UHD 770, 1x 8gb DDR4, 256GB SSD (Ram is not upgradable)
I have also found 2 Ryzen models (Ryzen 3 75320u and Ryzen 5 7520u) with Radeon 610m. At 450 euros. But they seem to be a lot less capable of handling the game.
We would prefer to stay on the lower end of the budget, but not if that system will not meet the minimum requirements I have stated (1080p, ~60fps, low-medium settings)
If any of you have one of these 3 (5) systems I would like to know your settings, or I would love the insight of knowledgeable people to make a good choice.
Thank you.
dmvdmeij1989 An Intel Xe graphics chip of either standard flavor (80 or 96 EUs) is a lot faster than the 610M. But the 610M is faster than the particular Intel UHD graphics chips in the second and third options. "UHD" unfortunately covers a lot of different chips.
TechnicalCity has good information a lot of the time but is sometimes very far off. I don't know why but suspect that some DNF/crash results are clouding the data, which is not uncommon on these types of sites. Synthetic tests are also often misleading because they don't always mimic real-world workloads. That's why I check a few different sites and discard any data that's far outside the average from the other sites.
There's also the fact that results can vary widely from one game or test to another. And there's the fact that some tests are run at or near release, when a driver might not be updated for the new hardware or to make it work with older games; and those test results may never be removed from the database the site is using.
Point is, it can get really complicated, and even absorbing all the available data doesn't necessarily offer an actual answer.
This is my favorite site to check, although I always check others too:
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Radeon-610M-vs-Iris-Xe-G7-80EUs_11423_10395.247598.0.html
I like it because it tests real games, although results can be skewed when one GPU only has a small sample size. It can also show more granular behavior, for example maybe card X is beating card Y in the averages but only because card X is winning by a large margin at high resolutions. If the user is going to play at 1080p, results at 1440p or 4k would obviously not matter.
In the above link, you can see how results are kind of all over the map, which is a bit unusual but not overly so. What I can say for sure is that I haven't yet had anyone show up here or on Answers HQ with a 7x20 iGPU that won't run Sims 4, or that has lag or crashing bad enough for them to reach out for help. The chip is sort of new but not so much that it hasn't made it to Sims players at all yet.
For general use, all these graphics chips are fine. Sims 4 is orders of magnitude more demanding to run than anything in a browser, and most general use is about the CPU and RAM anyway. The processors are more than fine for now and should be for a few years, at least; beyond that, it depends on how greedy everyday desktop apps get as time goes by.