Forum Discussion
10 Replies
Sort By
- Thank you for the quick response EA. Been playing this game over 10 years and a response would really be nice even if you are not planning a world anytime soon.
- There are a lot of people waiting for the new world it seems ....a response would be appreciated by many EA
- The regular answer to questions like this (often every 2-3 months) is that a new world will be announced when they plan the release of a new world and not before. There are a number of factors that decide when a new world will be released and one of them (but not the only one) is how full and active the last few worlds are.
"gamerdruid;c-2220104" wrote:
The regular answer to questions like this (often every 2-3 months) is that a new world will be announced when they plan the release of a new world and not before. There are a number of factors that decide when a new world will be released and one of them (but not the only one) is how full and active the last few worlds are.
the last few servers were all the same style, news flash, nobody likes to play on those forgotten attacks servers anymore because of project people. the TA community at large has spoken, the fail wcs was played in the wrong format and there is something just not quite right in regards to the environment in FA servers and you should not base decisions on the state of the game based on these last few servers, its also the middle of summer and everyone is getting outside and getting good exercise hopefully.- I honestly do appreciate the response, however it had been quite awhile and I was not the only one asking about a new world. Plenty of in game chat. Of course you all decided a world with Morale would be to our liking. I mean we all want to take a year to finish it up (can you feel me rolling my eyes). To answer some of the players concerns about project of which I am a member. All I can say is the alliance is run with precision and extremely productive rules. I have never made top 50 and probably never will but they all and I mean they all dig. We all seem to want worlds that we can finish within a couple months and then move on to another. That is my take on the situation. I personally appreciate the efforts of the team to keep this game alive.
"Misterd1961;c-2220174" wrote:
I honestly do appreciate the response, however it had been quite awhile and I was not the only one asking about a new world. Plenty of in game chat. Of course you all decided a world with Morale would be to our liking. I mean we all want to take a year to finish it up (can you feel me rolling my eyes). To answer some of the players concerns about project of which I am a member. All I can say is the alliance is run with precision and extremely productive rules. I have never made top 50 and probably never will but they all and I mean they all dig. We all seem to want worlds that we can finish within a couple months and then move on to another. That is my take on the situation. I personally appreciate the efforts of the team to keep this game alive.
let me just say thankyou for sticking up for project in the forum not many people do and i believe it had a serious impact on the last forgotten attacks server. oh wait that was projects fault..."Misterd1961;c-2220174" wrote:
I honestly do appreciate the response, however it had been quite awhile and I was not the only one asking about a new world. Plenty of in game chat. Of course you all decided a world with Morale would be to our liking. I mean we all want to take a year to finish it up (can you feel me rolling my eyes). To answer some of the players concerns about project of which I am a member. All I can say is the alliance is run with precision and extremely productive rules. I have never made top 50 and probably never will but they all and I mean they all dig. We all seem to want worlds that we can finish within a couple months and then move on to another. That is my take on the situation. I personally appreciate the efforts of the team to keep this game alive.
let me be more specific than mister d for a moment, the project alliance is based off inviting all the top players from all the teams in the entire game which left us with nothing but a bunch of half teams and 1 mega team that every person in the game wants to join save for a few of us that see the project idea for what it is. and that is a very bad one that ultimately led to the decline of player participation overall not just in fa servers. this has been going on forever in this game project is just the culmination of of players that have been winning with the very same strategy of recruiting all the top players in every alliance. an alliance like rimuru tempest can come into the game all of a sudden and be popular because all they have to do is spend cp fast at the start to appear larger or better than everyone else, then they start recruiting efforts to degrade the competition. this has been destroying player morale and possible team building since the first servers and is the oldest strategy ever used in this game to win. now that there are not as many people playing and it has been like this for so long that everyone knows each other now and its become more of a popularity contest than a game since you are all on the same side even when you say you are not as proven by the lack of competition in every single server including wcs. project people straight up destroyed this game out of greed and drove away everyone not included in their little group so that the game would be easier for them. not one of those project teams or the players within that create new names for themselves have ever faced any adversity in the last few years and i can tell its getting boring now for them. i truly believe they realized what they did wrong and now they see we are all losing out on what used to be fun times, but its way too late the damage has been done and the environment still works in the favor of allowing mass cooperation. we all win if we work together but why did it have to happen in this game and not in real life where it actually would have done people some good. why dont you project people go do this crap in the places you live in and fix politics or something because we dont need this anticompetition here in this game. rant over, die project.- BL4STYOUU3 years agoRising NewcomerChad, you've only been complaining about the same thing for years yet I've never actually seen you play in any servers. When will you get over it? But I'll reply to you for this one time. Project has been dead since WCS. The culmination of alliances you see now is the same impact that was pre-project. In any facet that you have "teams" you will ALWAYS have people who migrate towards like-minded players. Do you watch professional sports? Do you see Lebron in the NBA creating superteams? What about the Yankees in baseball? Even in other games on other platforms, think as simple as Rocket League. If you follow anything sports related you know that players want to play for "contenders" because winning championships are fun. It's not a secret that some people are more competitive than others and want to play with similar skilled players. and I think the same applies to gaming which is why we have started seeing the evolution of e-sports.
Before project, it was the germans that ran the game for most of it's history. Project was literally created for the sole purpose of finding top players from 10+ alliances (hence the name project) to try and finally debunk the GOATs. It didn't happen in the fashion anyone would have liked, but mission achieved and now project has died. This idealization that because players from project prefer non-morale FA worlds is somehow our fault (I say our, as a project player playing with a handful of others) is laughable. Literally 95% of the "top" project players haven't even played since WCS so I find your complaining to be comical. I would hate to see how you face adversity in real life considering it sounds like you just want any player who has played for project to stop playing. Like you, I personally have a preference in a world type. It just so happens that I like non-morale FA worlds. So of course I would play those before anything else. I have made friendships and bonds with many of the same players since we have played on the same worlds (either together or as adversaries) for much of my 8 years on this game.
Side note, I can tell you from my experience in this game that ever since there was a nerf to PVP, almost every server I've played commanders from all top alliances would rather find a solution diplomatically then go to PVP because most top alliances have heavily funded users and the only ones that win during pvp is EA since the cost of PVP is astronomical. Mergers avoid PVP which means a world can be won faster = less funds used.
I'll add that a lot of new players often check the forums to see if a game is active, or if it's something they would enjoy based on player feedback. The fact you find a way to complain in almost every thread is just as likely to push new players away then it is to join a server that is won before it's started. Take some accountability and stop whining. If I was a a mod or admin, I would have silenced/muted you because the amount of complaining you do is detrimental to the game.
Also, I probably won't bother to read your reply. But I hope you enjoyed this read and consider some self-evaluation and awareness.
Cheers,
Blast - everybody is so bored by these project excuses/lies?
- As this has turned into yet another chad bashing / Project bashing thread I'm closing it.
About Tiberium Alliances General Discussion
Talk with other players about what is going on in your Command and Conquer: Tiberium Alliances game.1,193 PostsLatest Activity: 19 hours ago
Related Posts
Recent Discussions
- 19 hours ago
- 5 days ago
Chrome login
Solved7 days ago