Forum Discussion
- Groups are not necessary. I know the alphabet, thanks to sesame street :D.
I would be happy if
a) it shows how long a task still takes
b) if I could give tasks without tapping on the character
I'm just 27 with a few Premiumcharacters and it keeps me busy already. I think on 41 it will take very long. simpsons7795 wrote:
The list is in alphabetical order, so it's got that going for it. :)
i just wish they finally start grouping common things together to make it easier to find stuff- The characters are in alphabetical order(it scrolls fast) and the decorations are in order of level requirement(makes sense).
- mwdaltonNew Spectator
baddazoner wrote:
simpsons7795 wrote:
The list is in alphabetical order, so it's got that going for it. :)
i just wish they finally start grouping common things together to make it easier to find stuff
Alphabetical makes it pretty easy to find stuff. I want Krusty, I look at K. I want Skinner, I look at S. Etcetera. johnny50373 wrote:
The characters are in alphabetical order(it scrolls fast) and the decorations are in order of level requirement(makes sense).
decorations are not organised well at all it's stupid having to scroll thru a whole page to find a tree then scroll back to find something else.mwdalton wrote:
baddazoner wrote:
simpsons7795 wrote:
The list is in alphabetical order, so it's got that going for it. :)
i just wish they finally start grouping common things together to make it easier to find stuff
Alphabetical makes it pretty easy to find stuff. I want Krusty, I look at K. I want Skinner, I look at S. Etcetera.
Agreed. It could not be organized any simpler than this.- Agreed. I like the alphabetical listing for characters. Makes them very simple to find. :thumbup:
- Alpha organization is good with me, too. But if you're going to further sort, for me the most relavent categories would be: 1.) waiting for something to do, 2.) performing a task, and 3.) completed a task but still running around with a yellow thumbs-up because you missed me on your first pass through town. Although not necessarily in that order.
- mwdaltonNew Spectator
LanceUppercut808 wrote:
mwdalton wrote:
baddazoner wrote:
simpsons7795 wrote:
The list is in alphabetical order, so it's got that going for it. :)
i just wish they finally start grouping common things together to make it easier to find stuff
Alphabetical makes it pretty easy to find stuff. I want Krusty, I look at K. I want Skinner, I look at S. Etcetera.
HAH! So True. I can't see how much easier it could get, really...
Maybe a voice recognition thing where you say out loud "I want Krusty" and it gives you Krusty.
...That started off as satire, but that actually sounds kinda good. mwdalton wrote:
baddazoner wrote:
simpsons7795 wrote:
The list is in alphabetical order, so it's got that going for it. :)
i just wish they finally start grouping common things together to make it easier to find stuff
Alphabetical makes it pretty easy to find stuff. I want Krusty, I look at K. I want Skinner, I look at S. Etcetera.
Any other organisational method would make it harder to find somebody
Only change I can think of it separate those on task from those who are idle
About The Simpsons Tapped Out General Discussion
Talk about your The Simpsons: Tapped Out experience with other TSTO players.
49,415 PostsLatest Activity: 4 days agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 7 days ago
- 8 days ago
- 8 days ago
- 9 days ago
- 10 days ago