Forum Discussion
- Yeah, that's a no from me dawg.
- Nope..
- I may be willing to pay $25 a YEAR but I would expect a lot more content, better user support, and much more reliable servers/better programming to fix some of the issues. $6.99 per month? No way. And I would only be willing to pay that because I have already put over five years of my time into the game. I would never begin playing a game with a monthly or yearly fee (maybe a one-time download fee, but I haven't found one yet).
- That would kind of defeat the purpose of a 'Freemium' app, wouldn't it?
- theoriginalsteveNew SpectatorNo, I'm happy to throw some money at the occasional scratch card, the odd platinum card and the once-in-a-blue-moon paid-for character, but I would not pay a monthly fee. If that was brought in, I would stop playing.
"Doughal;c-2068358" wrote:
Do we think he's from EA? :D
Lol I am not from EA! They may hire me after this post !!- I'd support a monthly fee of that amount for an optional "prime membership" package. Access to a set amount per month of premium items, without needing donuts. Allowing unused benefit to rollover to the future months. Extra items, skins, etc. An enhanced version of the game. All sorts of software and websites and businesses offer different levels of optional perks for different rates. I see no reason for this to be any different.
If you're asking whether I'd pay a monthly fee simply to play the game... It's a moot issue. Pay-to-play is not an option for a game that is categorised as "freemium" - Given that I have the glitch for over an year now, of course not.
- No. Not at all.
You're basically separating the gamers into haves vs have nots. There more than enough of that going on in the world nowadays.
Again. NO.
About The Simpsons Tapped Out General Discussion
Talk about your The Simpsons: Tapped Out experience with other TSTO players.
49,403 PostsLatest Activity: 47 minutes agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 47 minutes ago
- 5 days ago
- 5 days ago