7 years ago
NERF THE WINGMAN/PEACEKEEPER
Honestly, every fight early game or even in the late game, any time you get into a gun fight, and you don't have either one of these guns, you're very unlikely to win the battle. Nerf the peacekeeper...
That's the point... if there's a gun that no one in their right mind would ever use if not for necessity, it's not viable. You said all weapons are viable. Hell, you could say it's so bad you're better off trying to punch people to death. I do that occasionally against people who got a gun that's not good before I got anything and win and I'm not particularly good at the game.
I excluded the Mozambique and P2020 from being viable guns...that's a given. My issue is complainin about guns that actually do their job. Such as the Wingman and Peacekeeper......
I agree that the other guns can all be used and are viable choices.
However, I do think that the Peacekeeper and Wingman tend to be the strongest "out of the box", meaning even if you don't get any attachments they're still amazingly strong. "That's the game", yeah, yeah I know, it has lots of RNG and that's okay, but even with RNG shouldn't the strongest guns be somewhat rare? There's the two legendary weapons after all. And I've seen people arguing that Wingman/Peacekeeper are still better than those.
I can totally agree with making these guns less common, as I said in one of my previous posts, but nerfing the damage is unnecessary to me. They do great the way they are in this game. Shields can be ridiculous to penetrate in this game and those two guns do a great job of doing just that. I also think that with how fast paced this game is Shields need to be high in order to increase survival. I think the Mastiff is better than the Peacekeeper, but has a high skill gap. You need to be more accurate and selective of your shots. Ultimately, some guns can be much better by simply increasing their stock clip size (R-99/R-301). I feel people are making these two guns out to be more imbalance than they actually are.