Unfair matchmaking
I just started the game a couple of days ago. Yesterday (2019.04.09.) something happened with the matching, and the teams were balanced. It was so much fun to play. We played 4-5 matches, and it star...
Forum Discussion
This is the reason why we need a ranked game. To make sure people are on the same level as you. Let's call it an avarage level.
Casual game (which is the standard queue now) shouldn't take in consider your or other peoples rank IMO.
Simply because then you will have * teams vs epic teams. That's not fair at all.
At OP:
https://answers.ea.com/t5/General-Feedback/Skill-based-Matchmaking-is-mandatory-for-better-player/td-p/7475309
If you want to add your voices to ours.
Skill-based MM is mandatory. All the reasons why are listed in the first post. There are no OBJECTIVE reasons somebody could be against SBMM. Only "reason" somebody could be against it would be because he plays the Fk out of the game and likes to stomp on newer players (or players that can't play as much due to responsabilities and/or having a life outside of the game) because it makes his ego feel better which is kind of sad really. Either that or people that believe they will one day become as good as say dizzy or shroud and they will finally be the ones doing the noob stomping. It's quite pathetic in both cases.
@TSF_VindictiV wrote:
At OP:
https://answers.ea.com/t5/General-Feedback/Skill-based-Matchmaking-is-mandatory-for-better-player/td-p/7475309
If you want to add your voices to ours.
Skill-based MM is mandatory. All the reasons why are listed in the first post. There are no OBJECTIVE reasons somebody could be against SBMM. Only "reason" somebody could be against it would be because he plays the Fk out of the game and likes to stomp on newer players (or players that can't play as much due to responsabilities and/or having a life outside of the game) because it makes his ego feel better which is kind of sad really.I'm not a skilled player, the only reason I have against it is it makes queue times much longer, at least in Australia because lack of players and we end up going against grand masters anyway.
Yeah thats what you don't want, but i doubt a groups of <50, 50-150, 150+ rankings would hinder the matchmaking too muchs if the player numbers are accurate.
Matchmaking rating should not be implemented to make people of the exact same skill level play each other.
Just a good guideline to separate players in a way that looting larry's and payed actors won't meet pro's.
There should NOT be a shown MMR that everybody can see and boast about..
95% of my teammates at the moment are friendly and helpful and understanding even when we lose a match.
A shown mmr and a leaderbord will turn these forums in one complaint about toxic players all over the place.
It will ruin the pretty good community this game currently has.
The only way to make work is to introduce Solo Or Duo and triple premade squads.
Don't get me started about Solo queus now.. ( 60 pathfinders grappling all over the place. )
The game as it Currently is is not ready for solo. I still hope they will implement it in a good way in the future.
When a competitive MMR will be introduced i can't imagine how i will respond when i need 1 more win to finally get my 2000+
And then this teammate clicks Caustic and wants to go bunker.
I will be part of the toxic community right there no doubt about it ^^
Community Highlights
- EA_Mako4 months ago
Community Manager
- EA_Mako6 months ago
