Amen to NiceWigg

@Gabrielmojo26"Pro players" Initiated nerfs that have bearing on the non pro circuit community. Which makes up a good percentage of the crowd.

Just because they have insanely good accuracy and reflexes doesn't mean everyone does. Also that in lieu of legend abilities.

Maybe for partial recognition they would have some good points. But so does the average gamer.

Every game is not a high stakes tournament match setting. And shouldn't be based around it.

@ColdHoursWho says this meeting was based around high stakes tournament match settings?

This forum can be very hard to keep up with sometimes, it’s either an XP circle “jerc”, or who’s got the biggest ego, what’s with the “i know more than you do mentality here” lolol.

This meeting seems like good news to me, maybe i just won’t share anything going forward, cause after all “this is nothing new”.

So many “bruh moments” on this forum it’s mind blowing!

@Gabrielmojo26Well who says it isn't? If the meetings are centered around pros it's certain that the calls reflect the gameplay at which they're at. Which are demanding in the eyes of normal players.

Yes. There are a lot of "bruh" moments on these threads. But that can be dispelled with every day logic. The input one introduces does not need to be quelled. If that's the case why bother at all? Of course there's going to be friction upon said criteria. It's natural. But to regulate the data that is true will be apparent when it is presented.

There are tons of good pointers and solutions within this forum. All of which do not need outside views to garner any unforeseen details.

The whole meeting livestream idea sounds great tbh. They would be able to monitor player feedback to any proposed ideas in real time also.