Why does the contact support have the option to report a player with their name and even allow you to send pictured evidence if they are just going to reply with an automated message directing you to a link for the 'how to report' guide?
Does that mean reporting the player through the contact support doesn't go through unless you actually go back and follow the steps in the guide?
I'm wondering the same. Does Apex not save chat logs?
@XxColdFangxX while some players imo should be named and shamed, the fact of the matter is innocent until proven guilty. I've seen a number of posts here that implied cheating in the first post with video, but were soon shown to be possibly otherwise by more experienced heads.
Do you know every single angle of the game that would make you a most excellent judge, jury and executioner?
@XxColdFangxX I don't think so. Perhaps you need you need reread my post.
"I've seen a number of posts here that implied cheating in the first post with video, but were soon shown to be possibly otherwise by more experienced heads."
Vs
"I can understand someone not seeing what the player was doing correctly, but if other players were wary of it they could confirm it with their own reports." Other players being the more experienced heads.
Basically the same thing.
Of course I don't know how they actually go into the game themselves to check these reports, but from all the controversy, it sounds like they aren't really doing anything.
Aside from inaccurate reports from someone who doesn't know the difference between hacks and a modded controller, what is the actual harm in the community being aware of a potential cheater?
Yes, it's always innocent until proven guilty, but with more people watching, wouldn't that help to confirm that?
And while I can actually see some issues with it, like harassment of the reported individual, think of it like a community watch.
Honestly the only thing different I saw in your post is you assuming that by putting a reported person in a watch list automatically means they're guilty, which I made no such statement, and that I also apparently had the ability to see every angle, which I had already made a point on saying not everyone sees everything correctly.
I reread your post multiple times before even replying to you. So perhaps instead of saying 'no you misread.' Maybe explain yourself better.
@XxColdFangxX wrote:
@Renegade_Prime86honestly I don't see why we aren't allowed to name and shame.
Vs
@OldTreeCreeper wrote:
@XxColdFangxX while some players imo should be named and shamed, the fact of the matter is innocent until proven guilty.
@XxColdFangxX don't see how you could be confused as to our posts being basically the same. You appear to say that players should be the ones to name and shame, I don't say that. QED
