Don't remove the jump towers!

---

@Cheese9Man wrote:

- Respawn/developer perspective: Easier to remove or add for balance changes just like what they did to KC and Olympus.

Also very easy to adjust the height to deny unfair rotation advantages.

I definitely agree, they are an essential part of the gameplay and make either quick deaths, quick kills or quick exits :D

@Cheese9ManIt is funny. Warzone adding towers and added ones people can carry in their kit.

I hate warzone but this is a good change for them.

3rd parties are just not a thing in Battle Royales.  It's 20 parties by the way, not 3, so let's get that straight.

And the next point is that the best way to avoid 3rd parties is play games with 2 teams.  Otherwise, you are playing a BR FOR 3rd parties.  I NEVER hear people complain when they show up as the 3rd party, by the way, and end up smoking 2 teams - because apparently then 3rd parties are okay. XD

But the jump towers, yeah, why get rid of them?  Sometimes I see the point of getting rid of a few, but there's all of 1 tower on Storm Point, a few on Olympus and now just a few on World's Edge.  In King's Canyon you don't even need them, but they exist.  With your flying dive trail showing, and your big loud noise, and your inability to shoot while you are flying about, it's a non-issue.  Jump Towers are for repositioning safely, or strategically, if you are hot dropping into a fight, you likely die and deserve to die.

This is like the gold shield 'issue' from Respawn.  They have their heads in a dark, particularly smelly, place when they think of what they need to do to 'make their game better'

But don't fix the Ranked system, Respawn, noooo, don't do that! (lel)

I think Storm Point would have gone over better if it was more jump towers than gravity cannons.

Or, if the gravity cannons were like the ones in the IMC Armories. They launch you straight up and you can pick your direction to dive.