Forum Discussion
@Kwadwo-sanCan you know for sure that was the instance that got you in trouble? If you responded to that, maybe you respond to others?
Either way you can ensure no future issues by not reacting. Just report and leave.
@hayhorI actually was very surprised how the system works, if I got banned for just typing a leading question where my only reason was to give them the possibility to apologize or just confirm so there is no mistakes when EA checks to logs. But with this outcome, I start to think - that this system is AI-based or just a program that handles most but all the initiation problems. Thinking back to one instance before where I got warned, where I thought human people should be able to read or have the recordings where they utter those bad words, but no - EA decided to keep that warning on my profile, and I am still against that warning. However - in that previous instance I vented back.
- 5 years ago
@Kwadwo-sanWhat I question is why don't the developers at Respawn make a profanity filter for chat. Hey Respawn devs, hang a note up by your bed and every moring read the note out loud: "Why do we chose banning players left and right, instead of having a profanity filter THAT ACTUALLY PROTECTS PEOPLE FROM ATTACKS?" You Respawn devs... smh.
Respawn YOU made the game and so you have to take responsibility of players getting ramped up, frustrated and angry at eachother. Its HUMAN. So YOU have to take responsibility for players attacking eachother on YOUR platform. Take this responsibility in a more protecting manner. Banning players isn't good enough and the way you execute it affects normal and innocent players as well. Do your homework.
- 5 years ago@Ingeniekey This is like saying that soccer stadiums are responsible for when certain fans start a riot against other fans. Doesn't make sense, sorry.
- 5 years ago
@LaughingSharkoYou misunderstand. I'm saying devs are indirectly responsible for players attacking and actually being attacked. Because their lack of having a profanity filter is with your analogy like not having security or police preventing riots at a game. You can't just make a bonfire in the woods then ban anyone setting the forest on fire. The forest is allready on fire. Do you get it now? Its the devs fault people are actually being attacked in the game. They also create a toxic and rage inducing game environment.
- 5 years ago@Ingeniekey I think you have a valid point, I think they could easily do a chatfilter. But not only that, really - what is the point having such a short maximum field for the text, and what is up with that cutting of sentences just because there is a game scene switch? This game scene switch even affect the sound when actually on the mic. Well - back to the point you have - I cannot agree more, but perhaps they just want people to behave exactly how they want, otherwise you need to purchase new games which you loose when you are banned.
- hayhor5 years agoHero@Ingeniekey I'd like to see a filter also to stop some of what is typed but at the end of the day the person is responsible for what they type.
- hayhor5 years agoHero@Kwadwo-san For sure there is some automation in this. It is why I say dont say anything.
- 5 years ago@hayhor I know, and I shall, since I cannot have it like this .... not able to be using my account for ... yeah for this.
Community Highlights
Recent Discussions
- 8 hours ago
- 11 hours ago