If Apex did this, would you be mad?
Seems like Blizzard is trying to stop people from having loads of accounts. https://twitter.com/lackingsaint/status/1577653381283418117?t=gmS9yBWgmSWuXyexGWE2Bg&s=19
Forum Discussion
@hayhorThe typical argument is, not everyone has a phone plan, but imo 90% of households nowadays has at least one family member with a phone plan, not sure how one would function in today's environment without one.
I'd increase the amount of accounts per phone number tho, 2 or 3 at the most, not sure why someone would need more than that.
@Gabrielmojo26 I think the bigger issue is a phone plan vs prepaid. I know quite a few people who do prepaid because for them it is cheaper.
@hayhorHaven't purchased a prepaid plan prior to owning a flip phone, which is 20+ years ago, so I wouldn't know how much they go for today, but if you're paying 20-30$ per prepaid plan (random guess), then I would assume you're still drastically cutting the smurfs, and cheaters, if that's the price you need to pay for a smurf account.
I use a plan for my phone in the Philippines and a prepaid plan in Japan. I can imagine other people moving from country to country as well having prepaid cards. I heard that a lot of people from the EU use prepaid phones?
There are other ways to counter smurfing. Even my bank doesn’t require a post paid plan then why is it a game have stricter rules? Getting to level 10 is too easy in apex to join rank. Smurfs are not a big problem in pubs.
Btw if Apex did this, I would not be mad. We need this type of roadmaps. Btw, cross progression in a game where it didn’t initially have one same with Fall Guys which was initially an indie game. The excuse of legal concerns is just simply that, an excuse.
Featured Places
Apex Legends General Discussion
Discuss the latest news and game information around Apex Legends in the community forums.Community Highlights
- EA_Mako1 month ago
Community Manager
