NERF AIM ASSIST
I only post when i see a huge occurrence of something.....NERF AIM ASSIST .... from Xim Apex to REWASD and then JUST Console in general is basically soft aimbot mid to CqC... certain settings give yo...
Forum Discussion
@Sand_spitter even in that video you can see it pulling towards the target when he strafes left and right... thanks for prooving my point lol
@RevMainPls That's what's been bothering you this whole time?? Dude, they can have it removed I don't even care lol! It's useless once there is any input on the right stick and did you see it only moves ever so slightly. It will not "track" a moving target for you. In a fight it will be 100% pointless. All good bro, didn't know that's what you were referring to.
- @Sand_spitter It does track a moving target for you... and the closer you are the stronger it is, the effect is much stronger when the enemy is strafing infront of you because it counteradjusts to their movement with 0ms reactiontime and this is why MnK is annoyed with it and nothing else
- @RevMainPls It's rendered useless if there's input from the right stick. Like I said, I won't even care if they remove that part of it.
@RevMainPls The video he showed implied a couple things and one of them is that AA doesn't track for you while you're aiming. Seems like it pulls towards your target but only while the player isn't touching the right stick at all. If you believe the video it suggests (but doesn't prove) your point is wrong.
The video also shows that AA is stronger on PC-Controller when not ADS but suggests Console players have slightly stronger pull when ADS. Both of those examples are only for when NOT touching the aim stick though.
Everyone agrees that controller is stronger in close combat but counter adjusting to movement... that's even a flat out lie or I don't understand what you mean.
- @heme725 it allways pulls towards the target even when you move the stick, else it wouldnt do anything at all, the whole argument would be dead in 1 sec if that was the case. Pro´s wouldnt call it broken including controllerplayers themself... You can also test that pretty easy yourself in shootingrange even on the dummy
For the responding to movement, just go to shootingrange with a friend both of you do A/D spam and see how it responds to his movement, it does follow his movement obviously... else it wouldnt be an aimassist
Once again if Aimassist wouldnt do anything while moving the stick, controller also wouldnt be stronger in close combat because it doesnt do something right? 😉 - @RevMainPls You need to remember that you absolutely HAVE to touch the right stick to balance the recoil. You are pulling in the opposite direction - down. If it pulled the other way by itself recoil control would be a mess.
@RevMainPls There are rare moments when I'm trying to shoot an active player and my aim slightly sticks to his knocked teammate (not sure if this is simply the slowdown effect or actual sticking if I'm honest) so I'm not shooting down that idea entirely. I'm saying the effect is so weak while you're aiming it's basically negligible.
Pros are annoyed by controller players' effectiveness at close range and the idea of players having assisted aim since it doesn't sound skillful. None of them fairly discuss the different advantages of each input device or the amount of skill it takes for different systems to perform the same moves. They also have a tendency to exaggerate things by calling AA a straight up Aim Bot despite the strength of each being worlds apart.
The following is what I personally think of AA:
What makes AA strong at close range to me is the slow down effect. When trying to track a strafing player its typical for my aim to slip off target as they move side to side. Slowing my crosshairs whenever I drag it across my target minimizes how often and how badly I'll slip off target allowing for more shots to hit. Similar to how lowering your sensitivity makes it a little easier to land shots since you're not able to move enough to overshoot your target.
