@Cheese9ManWell, let me start Apex, guess I can see which season...
season 9. All other seasons it was 2. Except season 3, where it says 3 wins, but I often had squads in season 3, so... played alot with these two Spanish diamond players. Don't know why they wanted to play with me. One didn't even speak any English. But we had good team synergy. The 3 wins that season was with them.
Holy ****, I was so bad in season 2. 😂😂 K/DR 0.42, 2.51% winrate. And then I found Lifeline 3 weeks into season 3, and we go up to K/DR 1.61, 8.49% winrate. I love Lifeline. ❤️
@CCbathwaterI seriously think modern multiplayer games that utilize SBMM (in non ranked modes) need to work on improving rewards.
I swear to you, I wouldn’t be so sour if I was getting rewarded for my misery, lol. I’m thinking that the game should inform you if you are in a high MMR lobby, and give you special rewards like exclusive skins or triple exp (that counts towards a level higher than 500).
To anyone who thinks higher skilled/competent players shouldn’t get rewarded more: please stay away from multiplayer games.
@reconzeroI’m totally fine with all players getting rewards. But the players exhibiting a higher competence in any activity should get greater rewards. People who dislike skill/competence hierarchies typically hate this idea.
Normally I would say that an acceptable greater reward would be more wins, but if we have a MM system that consistently pits players in situations that equalize wins and loses, then that point is moot.
Gold-level players playing in a lobby of equally skilled gold-level players is not the same as Master/Pred-level players playing in a lobby of equally skilled players— the latter is FAR more stressful because the match is far less forgiving; one mistake equals death.
So yes, these players deserve slightly more for the level of skill they are demonstrating, even in pubs.
The idea that “all players should win at the same rates and all players should get the same rewards, regardless of skill” is kind of ridiculous in my mind.
