According to #8: EA have thousands of e-mails like this, so they don't investigate cases, just give a basic auto-answer. And I undestand this. Ofc. that experimenting with recoil is a way to go, maybe recoil will get even better, it's just how they adjust it. And "We also shouldn't change the game because people abusing macro's" this is what coding game is about, after developing a game, you are changing it to add new features, fix bugs which people use and make source code harder to inject.
according to #10: Yes, the game is slowly becoming second fortn.., full of kids, but this is common with f2p games. Majority of people didn't understand what I wrote. If someone is just a little bit familiar with game developing and adding new systems to prevent cheaters, he should know what I meant.
according to #11: You also didn't undestand what I wrote. I didn't say that macro is complicated, I said even opposite. It's so simple, that adding this 2 small changes in mechanism would get rid of it completely without any harm.
It's sad to see that people don't understand you, and even EA staff don't want to refer to this great idea.
PUBG got rid of macro usesrs by implementing this idea in 1 day.
After this, they would have a lot of time to fight cheaters with WH, aimbot, and no recoil hacks which inject into game files.
There is no many cheaters in game, but people with aimbot, triggerbot and wh can definitely make this game annoying.
Community Manager
