Why is hitting pathfinder a headache?

---

@plivx wrote:

I know certain parts don't make you hit them but my bullets were straight on target.

Now if you don't there's any issue with him that's your pov but there's definitly an advantage using him.

---

You're welcome to play Pathfinder yourself for a while.

You'll be shocked how easily you get shot down when you're the pathfinder if you believe the meme about his hitbox.

I dumped 3 wingman shots center mass into a Caustic's abdomen from 3 yards range, they no-regged.

If that's what you're talking about, it's a latency issue, and has absolutely no bearing on pathfinders hitbox.

yes, need fix, play 3 hours today, meet couple of pathfinder, all shot on point, no damage.

---

@Huntinwabits wrote:
@Wingmannedbroyour too busy achieving the tops posts and replies, I have no idea how you would even have time to play or know how his hitbox is.. His hitbox needs to be Fixed. plain and simple

---

I really don't spend that much time here man, i'm terminally ill, so i'm not maintaining a job etc. Trust me that I play Apex a LOT.

I tested the hitbox in training mode, and it checks out. I played pathfinder, and enemies shoot me way easier than when I play Wraith, Octane, Lifeline or Bangalore.

I personally NEVER witnessed shots I hit center mass actually missing, yet everyone claims it does, but that's merely the words of random forum posts, and the actual EMPIRICAL DATA does NOT support those claims.

In a court of law, someone's testimony isn't worth anything when the forensic evidence points to the contrary.

---

@Huntinwabits wrote:
@Wingmannedbroyour too busy achieving the tops posts and replies, I have no idea how you would even have time to play or know how his hitbox is.. His hitbox needs to be Fixed. plain and simple

---

Most useless way of arguing ever.

If you have nothing constructive or funny to say.

Don't bother typing at all.

And i call hypocrite

---

@DaAceXD wrote:

---

@Wingmannedbro wrote:

---

---

Certain characters have visible components that are NOT part of their hitbox, Pathfinder more than anyone when accounting for his fleshy legendary skins.

Gibraltar has that thing on his back, you can hit that, but won't deal damage since it's not his body, Bloodhound helmet has parts you can hit, but wont deal damage since you didn't hit Bloodhound's head.

Etc.

Stop blaming his hitbox, it's an actual proven FACT that his hitbox is very accurate.

---

''Certain characters have visible components that are NOT part of their hitbox, Pathfinder more than anyone when accounting for his fleshy legendary skins.''

There you go, one of the problems.

When you shoot a pathfinder you feel like you hit him but you din't becouse of visible components bla bla bla bla bla.

''Stop blaming his hitbox, it's an actual proven FACT that his hitbox is very accurate.''

A verry accurate hitbox is a hitbox that when you shoot the target you HIT him.

If there are 2387465237864523874 components on the legend that don't count as a hit then its a proven FACT the hitbox is terrible right?

If removing those components is a indirect solution to the hitbox problem thats fine by me.

The definition of a verry accurate hitbox should include all components.

So bullets not hitting pathfinder when you feel like they should could verry well be becouse of those components you keep talking about.

But by no meens is it OK now.

I think even when you make Pathfinders hitbox accurate when components are removed.

You still have a way to hard hitbox to hit considering his INSANE best ingame skills.

Every other legend has either a small hitbox OR good skills.

At the moment pahtfinder is the king in both.

And some legends have neither ( They should receive a buff BUT they are not ruining the game atm. )

And saying people should play pathfinder to find out hes not harder to hit does not work.

If you play a legend you can't see if a bullet shot should have hit you or not.

I don't know if the person shooting me is a potato or if its hitbox problems.

Was this part of your research to prove FACTS?

This goes the other way as well.

People playing pathfinder to state they get hit a lot less is the dumbest way to claim a hitbox is good or not.

You can only see if a hitbox is broken by shooting it yourself.

So yes, Lets start by removing all the components on the pathfinder.

A good hitbox has WAY more value to over cool skins.

And after that lets see again.

---

I wanna touch on this comment.

"A verry accurate hitbox is a hitbox that when you shoot the target you HIT him.

If there are 2387465237864523874 components on the legend that don't count as a hit then its a proven FACT the hitbox is terrible right?

If removing those components is a indirect solution to the hitbox problem thats fine by me."

This is a wrong way of thinking. In that same logic, shooting Bangalore's puffy hair should count as headshots right?

Ofc not, that would be dumb, since it's hair, and not her head.

Stop aiming for Pathfinders skinny limbs (which have the grappling hook gadgets fitted on them) and just aim for his huge torso for a change.

How hard is to aim at his body? You must be really bad if you can't that, his torso is huge and easy to hit.