M16A4 Attachment Costs Feel Too High
Someone pointed it out and I checked to see that the M16A4 has the damage model of the DRS-IAR copied and pasted on it.
And it seems to be the case from looking at SORROW's BF6 Scribles.
Having i...
Forum Discussion
The M16 is incredibly good, it doesn't need a buff in attachment costs.
The M16 is incredibly good, it doesn't need a buff in attachment costs.
I have already explained that it is a clone of an existing gun but operating with 25 points less. It feels good because it is a clone of an existing incredibly good gun with the nostalgic M16 looks and sounds
Please read.I did read. I just don't agree with you on any level. You aren't forced to use the receiver, it's a trade of.
I did read. I just don't agree with you on any level. You aren't forced to use the receiver, it's a trade of.
a trade off that just simulates an inferior version of another existing weapon is not a trade off but a Faustian bargain, a trap.
3 burst guns ain't getting the job done anyway in BF games, The thing a burst gun is supposed to be good for is in the territory of the 2 burst AN-94 which is designed to output the 2 shots before the recoil kicks in
Featured Places
