Forum Discussion

canoli216's avatar
canoli216
Seasoned Newcomer
14 days ago

Frustrating dealbreakers

Playing time deal breaker seems to be poorly implemented. I had 5 senior WRs ahead of a true freshman, who was going to be WR 2 as a RS Freshman in year two. He wanted to transfer because he was unable to recognize that he was about to jump up to the top of the depth chart. 

Maybe transfers happening after graduation and draft results would fix this. 

Secondly, playing style is a frustrating deal breaker and should be toned down.

I remember in old games being able to make promises to players that wanted to transfer or even during recruiting. Where you’d get a boost to acquisition or retention with a promise, but you’d get some debuffs if you didn’t follow through. That might help make the transfer portal more forgiving in those situations that don’t make sense. 

1 Reply

  • IceColdJD's avatar
    IceColdJD
    Seasoned Newcomer
    12 days ago

    Agree about the playing style deal breaker. I'm recruiting a 4* WR with a C+ playing style deal breaker. 

    I complete about 10-12 passes a game to WR.

    It's giving me a playing style rating of D+.

    Seems a little unbalanced.

About College Football 26 Dynasty

Chat with the community about your Dynasty in EA SPORTS™ College Football 26.266 PostsLatest Activity: 3 hours ago