Forum Discussion
@Ri-Go_HUN7Yeah it is no cash grab (we have Nintendo to thank for those) since ME:1 has a lot of work done to it. ME:2 also has a bunch of bugs fixed, but the kicker for me is the ONE major bug from ME:2 that they didn't fix, the constant crashes to desktop if you use a Sentinel and your mouse on the QUICK BAR. Fix that or I'm really sad. (Also add a UI size slider to ME:3 thanks 🙂
Fix the "people that don't get up" also and I'll be happy. Those 2 major bugs. On a side note, in ME:1 you could use adept and need to reload on Feros if you knocked one of the husks behind the ships (during the gas grenade section).
@AlistairABME1:LE is not a bad work, I think. But the other two is just not as good quality, as the originals.
Some ugly grapich bugs broke some important cutscene (the Human Reaper after death falls into a black graphics glitch, in ME3's Priority: Tuchanka mission, the Reaper's laser won't follow you, the destruction of the Quarian Fleet cutscene is broken too).
In a game, with movie style cutscenes this is not a great thing. The new achievement system is broken, and the gamepay is broken too, because of this "people that don't get up" bug.
No new bug fixes, no new content, no improvements in ME2-3:LE, aside from the new, great looking textures, but that is not enough, if in return they break many things what was worked before. I don't want much more improvement in ME2-3, because they are great games in the original form, I just want a properly working new console version, which is not less in any way, than the originals.
I loved to play ME1:LE, but the ME2-3:LE mediocre quality is just disappointing for me. It's not what I want, and what the community deserves for a full priced game.
About Mass Effect Franchise Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 16 hours ago
- 3 days ago
- 4 days ago