The last time there was the feat of kills with non-seperatist droids IG-88 didn't count because the unit was missing the conq_nonsepdroid in the categoryId, well now we have this feat again with 2 new droids and guess what they are missing @CG_Tusken_Meathead ....0-0-0 and BT-1 do not have the categoryId of conq_nonsepdroid.Unless you all changed how it is looking for these units might be nice to fix before conquest startsHere is what I am showing for their tags0-0-0BT-1:Here is what Threepio & Chewie has (counted for kills last time the feat existed:

Someone give Scuba a job on the QA team please. Good catch.

Why do they have to do this? Why can't they just require "species_droid AND NOT affiliation_separatist" They make it so hard on themselves. Oy.

"MasterSeedy;c-2401378" wrote:Why do they have to do this? Why can't they just require "species_droid AND NOT affiliation_separatist" They make it so hard on themselves. Oy. I wonder the same thing sometimes.Maybe they did change it this time around, but last time when 88 didn't count towards the feat it was because he was missing the tag

"scuba;c-2401383" wrote:"MasterSeedy;c-2401378" wrote:Why do they have to do this? Why can't they just require "species_droid AND NOT affiliation_separatist" They make it so hard on themselves. Oy. I wonder the same thing sometimes.Maybe they did change it this time around, but last time when 88 didn't count towards the feat it was because he was missing the tagI mean, maybe, but considering they both got "conq_maybebestfriends" for another feat I doubt it.

"Nauros;c-2401409" wrote:The point of the feat is to make us waste resources on 5OR-T, so they will probably keep it and then act all surprised when it gets "discovered" during conquest.Why would they want to keep the playerbase from spending resources on bt1 and 000 too?

0-0-0 and BT-1 to suffer the same fate for Conquest as IG-88?

cirby34
2 years ago
Someone give Scuba a job on the QA team please. Good catch.
MasterSeedy
Rising Ace
2 years ago
Why do they have to do this?

Why can't they just require "species_droid AND NOT affiliation_separatist"

They make it so hard on themselves. Oy.
scuba75
Rising Traveler
2 years ago
"MasterSeedy;c-2401378" wrote:
Why do they have to do this?

Why can't they just require "species_droid AND NOT affiliation_separatist"

They make it so hard on themselves. Oy.

I wonder the same thing sometimes.
Maybe they did change it this time around, but last time when 88 didn't count towards the feat it was because he was missing the tag
EnigmaPotatoes
New Spectator
2 years ago
"scuba;c-2401383" wrote:
"MasterSeedy;c-2401378" wrote:
Why do they have to do this?

Why can't they just require "species_droid AND NOT affiliation_separatist"

They make it so hard on themselves. Oy.

I wonder the same thing sometimes.
Maybe they did change it this time around, but last time when 88 didn't count towards the feat it was because he was missing the tag

I mean, maybe, but considering they both got "conq_maybebestfriends" for another feat I doubt it.
0bigk4z8gw1c
2 years ago
"Nauros;c-2401409" wrote:
The point of the feat is to make us waste resources on 5OR-T, so they will probably keep it and then act all surprised when it gets "discovered" during conquest.

Why would they want to keep the playerbase from spending resources on bt1 and 000 too?
jakedonels786
New Spectator
2 years ago
"MasterSeedy;c-2401484" wrote:
This isn't a bug.

We don't know for sure how this is coded (remember my implementation idea above) or what final behaviour will be or whether the problem is the description (perhaps they meant to exclude the Aphra droids for some reason, but the description got copied over from earlier?)

This could, after all, be a feature that works as intended -- and we're not even sure how it works!

No, this is hard information, but it isn't (yet) an identified "bug". This is the right place to put it.

https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/261270/hotfix-1-19-2023#latest
BeeblebroxRocks
2 years ago
But of course it will have been tested before release...! :D
scuba75
Rising Traveler
2 years ago
"Enigmatic_Potato;c-2401387" wrote:
"scuba;c-2401383" wrote:
"MasterSeedy;c-2401378" wrote:
Why do they have to do this?

Why can't they just require "species_droid AND NOT affiliation_separatist"

They make it so hard on themselves. Oy.

I wonder the same thing sometimes.
Maybe they did change it this time around, but last time when 88 didn't count towards the feat it was because he was missing the tag

I mean, maybe, but considering they both got "conq_maybebestfriends" for another feat I doubt it.

Logic
BeeblebroxRocks
2 years ago
"TheDude420;c-2401344" wrote:
Someone give Scuba a job on the QA team please. Good catch.

Wouldn't they have to create that team first, lol!
LendersQuiz
Rising Traveler
2 years ago
@scuba
Try posting the bug here as well:
https://answers.ea.com/t5/Bug-Reports/bd-p/star-wars-galaxy-of-heroes-bug-report-en