3v3 territory war?

3v3 sucks bad idea

"IDinDooNuffin;c-1850366" wrote:

"Vos_Landeck;c-1850354" wrote:

"Firebrigade;c-1850340" wrote:
I’m completely in favor of this. It’s not *that* out of the blue, we’ve had tons of 3v3 GA to figure it out.

GA is individual. Planning out a TW is nothing like GA. You have to take into account your entire guild's roster inventory and scout out the same for your opponent. You're setting entire zones of a couple dozen teams. Clearly you are not in charge of TWs for your guild.

Dont join. Sit out the TW. Stress removed. Youre welcome

"IDinDooNuffin;c-1850366" wrote:

"Vos_Landeck;c-1850354" wrote:

"Firebrigade;c-1850340" wrote:
I’m completely in favor of this. It’s not *that* out of the blue, we’ve had tons of 3v3 GA to figure it out.

GA is individual. Planning out a TW is nothing like GA. You have to take into account your entire guild's roster inventory and scout out the same for your opponent. You're setting entire zones of a couple dozen teams. Clearly you are not in charge of TWs for your guild.

Dont join. Sit out the TW. Stress removed. Youre welcome

Never said thx bra

"Arus;c-1850322" wrote:
we need to put in hours and hours to figure out a new strategy for 3v3 tw.

This is overstating the case a little. Most effective 5v5 teams can be whittled down to a 3v3 version that works just as well or nearly so.

3v3 TW is a horrible idea. The people who say don’t join obviously don’t plan highly competitive TWs. Those of us who do have no desire for 3v3. Just think how hard it is dealing with one DR/BSF/Malak squad in GA then multiply that by 50. There is no grinding that down. On top of that it’s planned for a holiday weeeknd in the US so you will have huge availability problems. Please @CG_SBCrumb reconsider this plan.

And you can’t just not join if you want to be competitive in this game. Giving up zetas willingly is asinine

"Jarvind;c-1850399" wrote:

"Arus;c-1850322" wrote:
we need to put in hours and hours to figure out a new strategy for 3v3 tw.

This is overstating the case a little. Most effective 5v5 teams can be whittled down to a 3v3 version that works just as well or nearly so.

The counters are different and the mechanics are different. It is a ton of planning and trying to test

"Jarvind;c-1850399" wrote:

"Arus;c-1850322" wrote:
we need to put in hours and hours to figure out a new strategy for 3v3 tw.

This is overstating the case a little. Most effective 5v5 teams can be whittled down to a 3v3 version that works just as well or nearly so.

A lot of teams are good in 5v5 while sucks in 3v3, like the troopers, Ewoks, other teams like BH are much better in 3v3, counters are completely different.

And the number of teams that can put on defence in each territory will also change, which means you need to reorganize your guild's forces.

I think Yohann hit the nail squarely on the head. This thing is bonkers for multiple reasons.
Holiday weekend will seriously hurt participation. I am pretty sure that the number of teams per person will be doubled, or almost. And I really am NOT looking forward to 2 zones mostly filled with DR+Malak teams.

Please, please, please reconsider.
I am really hoping it was just a copy-paste error and meant to say "Vanilla"

Bitches be tripping

Give us 30 or 35 teams per territory first