3v3 territory war?

"TVF;c-1850839" wrote:

"Jaxom;c-1850832" wrote:

"NoMack;c-1850824" wrote:
The whining on this thread may be the most hilarious I've seen on these forums. Changing ONE TW seems be ruining the lives of countless individuals. The poor guild officers will be forced to spend days locked in their rooms preparing for the gargantuan task of teaching their members how to tackle the never-before-seen 3v3 format! How can they be expected to deal with such a change? What if their opponents have Malak? It's on a holiday in one country for gods sake! Doesn't CG understand that there are competitive guilds out there where a difference in one zeta-mat may result in the ultimate failure of their members? Change is bad and scary, so please leave things the same forever; that's how we want this game to be.

I don't see whining, I see people who play this game for one reason (winning highly competitive TWs at the highest tiers) making logical and legitimate arguments as to why this is a terrible idea. What I do see is you bashing those people for no reason. If you'd like to make a coherent argument in support of this 3v3 TW, feel free to do so, but if you're purpose in posting is to point out that everyone else is a whiner, feel free to keep your opinions to yourself.

If TW is the only reason you play the game, wouldn't you want to try something new once in a while?

I do, but 3v3 in a TW format is really bad. As it has been said before if you see 50 DR/BSF/Malak squads, how are you going to beat that? they are taking away the only non mirror counter.

"TVF;c-1850839" wrote:

"Jaxom;c-1850832" wrote:

"NoMack;c-1850824" wrote:
The whining on this thread may be the most hilarious I've seen on these forums. Changing ONE TW seems be ruining the lives of countless individuals. The poor guild officers will be forced to spend days locked in their rooms preparing for the gargantuan task of teaching their members how to tackle the never-before-seen 3v3 format! How can they be expected to deal with such a change? What if their opponents have Malak? It's on a holiday in one country for gods sake! Doesn't CG understand that there are competitive guilds out there where a difference in one zeta-mat may result in the ultimate failure of their members? Change is bad and scary, so please leave things the same forever; that's how we want this game to be.

I don't see whining, I see people who play this game for one reason (winning highly competitive TWs at the highest tiers) making logical and legitimate arguments as to why this is a terrible idea. What I do see is you bashing those people for no reason. If you'd like to make a coherent argument in support of this 3v3 TW, feel free to do so, but if you're purpose in posting is to point out that everyone else is a whiner, feel free to keep your opinions to yourself.

If TW is the only reason you play the game, wouldn't you want to try something new once in a while?

new? yes. But like @Skylicus said above, we're happy to see constructive change, we'd LOVE to see it. This is not an improvement, this is lazy and will be unenjoyable to the guilds that have 45-50 malaks on their rosters.

"TVF;c-1850839" wrote:

"Jaxom;c-1850832" wrote:

"NoMack;c-1850824" wrote:
The whining on this thread may be the most hilarious I've seen on these forums. Changing ONE TW seems be ruining the lives of countless individuals. The poor guild officers will be forced to spend days locked in their rooms preparing for the gargantuan task of teaching their members how to tackle the never-before-seen 3v3 format! How can they be expected to deal with such a change? What if their opponents have Malak? It's on a holiday in one country for gods sake! Doesn't CG understand that there are competitive guilds out there where a difference in one zeta-mat may result in the ultimate failure of their members? Change is bad and scary, so please leave things the same forever; that's how we want this game to be.

I don't see whining, I see people who play this game for one reason (winning highly competitive TWs at the highest tiers) making logical and legitimate arguments as to why this is a terrible idea. What I do see is you bashing those people for no reason. If you'd like to make a coherent argument in support of this 3v3 TW, feel free to do so, but if you're purpose in posting is to point out that everyone else is a whiner, feel free to keep your opinions to yourself.

If TW is the only reason you play the game, wouldn't you want to try something new once in a while?

I appreciate you asking questions and trying to understand.

This one TW isn't the problem, well it is a problem due to DR/Malak as has been pointed out, but its not the bigger issue.

CG keeps doing these "changes" (banned wars, buff wars, 3's wars) because TW is "stale and boring". Even if I liked the changes they are doing I still wouldn't be happy as they are not addressing the actual issues with TW. They are trying to put a band aid on something that requires surgery so that they can keep releasing their new shiny toons every two weeks.

As I said before, this is incredibly discouraging for TW focused guilds - especially end game ones.

Jaxom - One coherent argument: For everyone out there who wants things to stay the same, there's a person who likes to try something new. This is for that person. There are LOTS of comments on threads about how stale TW is, so here we are.

Yohan - I fully appreciate the amount of time officers put in. My officers are fantastic. That said, you decide your level of involvement in this optional video game role and may even step down entirely if the pressure becomes too great. I would think no less of my guild officer who says "hey guys, I don't wanna be an officer anymore... Someone else wanna do it?"

"NoMack;c-1850851" wrote:
Jaxom - One coherent argument: For everyone out there who wants things to stay the same, there's a person who likes to try something new. This is for that person. There are LOTS of comments on threads about how stale TW is, so here we are.

Yohan - I fully appreciate the amount of time officers put in. My officers are fantastic. That said, you decide your level of involvement in this optional video game role and may even step down entirely if the pressure becomes too great. I would think no less of my guild officer who says "hey guys, I don't wanna be an officer anymore... Someone else wanna do it?"

Thanks :)

Yes, I agree some want change and some don't. Happens to be that most of us would like change as well, we just wish more thought was put into what that change was.

Skylicus - I will certainly keep my sarcasm coming; it's my second favorite type of asm. As for the "ignorance" comment: Ignorance implies a lack of understanding. I fully understand and still find amusing... Similar to my views on scientology. See? Sarcasm. You did say please.

For those highly competitive tw guilds complaining of 3v3 and a wall of DR malak teams well guess what? Your opponent has the exact same problem. This 3v3 simply makes it even more competitive which is exactly what I though you wanted. Besides I thought everyone said JKA simply destroys DR/malak so it should be easy :p

Fair enough /shrug

"Kokie;c-1850874" wrote:
For those highly competitive tw guilds complaining of 3v3 and a wall of DR malak teams well guess what? Your opponent has the exact same problem. This 3v3 simply makes it even more competitive which is exactly what I though you wanted. Besides I thought everyone said JKA simply destroys DR/malak so it should be easy :p

Apparently someone hasn’t read the nerf to JKA that was posted yesterday.

"Kokie;c-1850874" wrote:
For those highly competitive tw guilds complaining of 3v3 and a wall of DR malak teams well guess what? Your opponent has the exact same problem. This 3v3 simply makes it even more competitive which is exactly what I though you wanted. Besides I thought everyone said JKA simply destroys DR/malak so it should be easy :p

So I should be happy that my opponent as well as I can't clear the first two walls? That isn't competition, that is a broken game mode.