50/50? Pretty please?
Whadda ya say, CG? Can we get an option to take a .500 reward for GAC when you run 3v3 (hopefully no more than once a year), and skip the anguish and frustration?
Forum Discussion
"Snap_Wexley;d-256064" wrote:
Whadda ya say, CG? Can we get an option to take a .500 reward for GAC when you run 3v3 (hopefully no more than once a year), and skip the anguish and frustration?
Once a year, lol. You think they started introducing 3v3 omis for once a year use?"DonPuto;c-2360334" wrote:
That'll buy a lot of freakin' kitty food"Snap_Wexley;c-2360353" wrote:
"CCyrilS;c-2360333" wrote:
"Snap_Wexley;d-256064" wrote:
Whadda ya say, CG? Can we get an option to take a .500 reward for GAC when you run 3v3 (hopefully no more than once a year), and skip the anguish and frustration?
Once a year, lol. You think they started introducing 3v3 omis for once a year use?
Is that omi 3v3 specific? The femme-bot one?
And do you think they make us play 3v3 because they think we like it?
The tuskens omi is 3v3 specific.- I like 3 vs 3
- I like 3v3
"Snap_Wexley;c-2360353" wrote:
"CCyrilS;c-2360333" wrote:
"Snap_Wexley;d-256064" wrote:
Whadda ya say, CG? Can we get an option to take a .500 reward for GAC when you run 3v3 (hopefully no more than once a year), and skip the anguish and frustration?
Once a year, lol. You think they started introducing 3v3 omis for once a year use?
Is that omi 3v3 specific? The femme-bot one?
And do you think they make us play 3v3 because they think we like it?
3v3 is a fun change of pace. 5v5 gets stale seeing the same boring meta teams in every match. 3v3 makes you use your brain."NicWester;c-2360575" wrote:
"Snap_Wexley;c-2360353" wrote:
"CCyrilS;c-2360333" wrote:
"Snap_Wexley;d-256064" wrote:
Whadda ya say, CG? Can we get an option to take a .500 reward for GAC when you run 3v3 (hopefully no more than once a year), and skip the anguish and frustration?
Once a year, lol. You think they started introducing 3v3 omis for once a year use?
Is that omi 3v3 specific? The femme-bot one?
And do you think they make us play 3v3 because they think we like it?
3v3 is a fun change of pace. 5v5 gets stale seeing the same boring meta teams in every match. 3v3 makes you use your brain.
3v3 isn't any more interesting than 5v5. The game mode itself if freaking boring. It is the exact same teams every time.- There's no reason 3v3 isn't going to be every bit as stale as 5v5 if it's back to alternating every season.
"Screerider;c-2360779" wrote:
"CCyrilS;c-2360730" wrote:
Highly disagree. So many possibilities, and it takes time to find the most efficient uses. Add to that everyone's continually changing rosters, there is a lot more likelihood for variation.
It's true, there will be an initial lag, due to its lengthy absence, but eventually it will settle down to the same teams, like 5v5 does.
Changing rosters applies to both 3v3 and 5v5.
3v3 means more combinations, more squads needed to set, and more needed for offense. It will always be more fluid than 5v5.- Mathematically, 5v5 would have a greater number of possible teams, since for each possible 3v3 team you also add two more additional characters. :)
