Again about the rivals (GA). Tired of it.

"OBoogieIII;c-1953435" wrote:

Here’s the answer, or as close as I can figure. I’ve come to this conclusion because this topic comes up time and time again.

I haven’t seen your opponents, but I’m guessing it goes something like this:

2-3 winnable matches for you.
3-4 matches that if you face them you will get obliterated

The reason behind this, is the top 4 are all big spenders. They don’t really like competitive matches. They will say they do and they will all say you’re whining and just need to get better, but look at the facts.

Most of the top 4 are typically those that spent a lot of money, they will have 1-2 real battles during each round of GAC. You would have to fight tooth and nail and have your opponent literally give up to win a round. But as you see here if you say anything they ridicule you and tell you to quit whining.

Those that blast you are all , mostly, hypocrites. They do so because if they had to form any real strategy other than throw down a meta team, they would lose. Their strategy is being able to beat yo before the match begins. They don’t want you to have a chance , if you got to face opponents that you could actually beat, that would mean they have to face opponents they could actually lose to.

Here’s what you are in GAC, you are an ego booster, I like to call it whale food. You’re nothing but a way those that spend in the game can feel good about themselves. They beat up on those that have zero chance and think they’ve done something. Now I’m not blaming them, they’re doing what needs to be done and beating those out in front of them.

If you look at how quickly certain nerfs happen and who it benefits, you’ll see I am correct. Just look back at the nerfs of the last year. Whenever a teams had a chance to beat the Sith empire team nerf away. It gave the common player a chance against the whales. Who complained ? The whales did, because they couldn’t form a strategy against it.

My advice, find another area your enjoy. No one is going to listen to you. They do not care. Don’t let the hate on this forum get you down. Take your time build the guys you enjoy playing with and have fun with your guild mates.

This would have to be the most honest, and accurate, thing I have ever read about this game. I know I'm whale food as I can't beat G13 Malak (yet) and I have faced a G13 Malak in the last 19 GA fights - and lost them all.

"OBoogieIII;c-1953435" wrote:

Do you really believe, that half the player base (4 / 8) are big spenders, and that scoring 2-3 wins is really that hard as a FTP player? Interesting. I wonder what gave you that idea.

"Waqui;c-1953484" wrote:

"OBoogieIII;c-1953435" wrote:

Do you really believe, that half the player base (4 / 8) are big spenders, and that scoring 2-3 wins is really that hard as a FTP player? Interesting. I wonder what gave you that idea.

Probably not something connected to consecutive rounds of poor performance. Don't you know by now that whoever beats and F2P must be a whale?

Yet another bitchpost. If you don't spend money, you won't win PvP that's how money works. I've beaten players with literally 10x my G12 as well as 5x my G13. This is about strategy and knowing the meta. You're bitching about a few mods and 100k, when we have people beating people with 1 mil or more GP over them.

You're literally just a new dog complaining an older player has a more refined and centrist roster than you.

This is very even man. Stop putting 12+ on so many and get the g13 finisher. You have way more 12+ pieces, they just focused more on getting that finisher.


Your mods are close to as good, keep slicing them. At your GP I don't see how you can complain about this matchup. With the fewer players in your division you could easily have a much worse matchup

"Serge;c-1953462" wrote:
I know. But for me: The difference is about 50k.

A less than one third of a percent difference.

@Waqui 4-8 big spenders? No. 4-8 big to moderate spenders? Yes.

Scoring 2-3 wins vs groups that f2p layers are out in? Yes. This is can speak from experience. 3-4 matches, per Round, that I personally have been put in are unwinnable. Not difficult to win, literally unwinnable. I’ve used my entire roster to beat one team and couldn’t even make a dent in the team.

Personally, I don’t think that should ever happen. Win or lose, I should be able to have something on my roster that could defeat the team I’m up against.

If it’s about strategy, I should be able to strategically put some team together from my current roster to win. If not, then why not just give them an automatic win and not waste our time?

"OBoogieIII;c-1953592" wrote:

Personally, I don’t think that should ever happen. Win or lose, I should be able to have something on my roster that could defeat the team I’m up against.

Every team has counters. It's up to you to have it in your roster.

@sir_Phantom_Jedi thank you. I feel the same, I’m getting there. Just not there quite yet. But I’m getting a little closer every time.

I'm 3.9 ml, closest one to me is 4.5. I didn't even try this GAC. May not join next one....