answer to TB rotations is not answer to the question that was asked

"Kyno;c-2033290" wrote:

"Spang;c-2032867" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2031396" wrote:
No they have not forgotten.

He asked a follow up and I missed it for a few days. I willping him again to see if we can get an answer.

I guess you live in a galaxy far far away from their office, and your ping hasn't reached them yet.

Or, as an alternative, I wish CG had internet access that isn't restricted to publishing packs by their provider.

Or we live in a world where things happen and people are not always available.

Crumb is a contact but very rarely the person with the answer, I have spoken to him a few times at this point, it's not about the ping it's about him getting an answer from people, and the priority and other underlying factors of a question like this doesnt always make that easy

It is also possible that a question like this raised a possibility they had not considered and rather than give an answer they wanted to explore this possibility and with the above in mind, it took longer than it should..... almost like they live in the real world, where things are not as simple as someone else makes them out to be from an outside view. But who knows.

Given that the solution that solves like 95% of the request is just to have players able to choose between LSHoth and DSGeo one week and DSHoth and LSGeo the other week, and that just means a scheduling change and doesn't require new UI or logic or anything, I really hope that the delay is due to them making sure that it won't somehow cause issues to swap the pairings and that they come back to us with, "Good idea, TB will work that way next month on". That'd be worth the wait.