I am seriously disappointed with the faction description of this character. She should definitely be labeled a sith, and be able to benefit from fighting with sith leaders abilities. This really goes against the canon of the storyline created by George Lucas. General Grievous I understand because he cannot use the force. But there is no legitimate reason not label Ventress a sith, she has held her own against and even bested several noteworthy jedi (including Kenobi, Anakin, Asokha, and Luminara), she can use the force, and was officially Count Dooku's apprentice. It's unfair, and possibly sexist that she isnt given sith attributes. How come male characters like Ezra Bridger and Kanan Jarrus can benefit from 3 factions (Jedi, rebel, and Phoenix) while Ventress is limited to only two. Are you saying only Male characters can have this benefit? Or that female characters all together aren't qualified enough to be a legitimate sith? I am offended by this and would like to see this correction made, or I will seriously consider getting the #metoo movement up in here, and file some official complaints. I expect better from Disney, and Lucasfilm!

Have I slipped into a timewarp and it's 2016/2017 again? The discussion has been settled, no Sith tag for Ventress as per CG and Disney.

I'm often labeled an SJW and even I'm not sure the OP is serious.

"Ninjah9;d-169635" wrote: Or that female characters all together aren't qualified enough to be a legitimate sith? II guess we've forgotten about the most powerful toon in the game at the moment

Asajj Ventress Limitations | EA Forums

Player_7ctrhms9
7 years ago
"Ninjah9;d-169635" wrote:
I am seriously disappointed with the faction description of this character. She should definitely be labeled a sith, and be able to benefit from fighting with sith leaders abilities. This really goes against the canon of the storyline created by George Lucas. General Grievous I understand because he cannot use the force. But there is no legitimate reason not label Ventress a sith, she has held her own against and even bested several noteworthy jedi (including Kenobi, Anakin, Asokha, and Luminara), she can use the force, and was officially Count Dooku's apprentice. It's unfair, and possibly sexist that she isnt given sith attributes. How come male characters like Ezra Bridger and Kanan Jarrus can benefit from 3 factions (Jedi, rebel, and Phoenix) while Ventress is limited to only two. Are you saying only Male characters can have this benefit? Or that female characters all together aren't qualified enough to be a legitimate sith? I am offended by this and would like to see this correction made, or I will seriously consider getting the #metoo movement up in here, and file some official complaints. I expect better from Disney, and Lucasfilm!

Is what it is. Deal with it.
Empiric1
7 years ago
Why is everyone not seeing this is a troll post?

Also she wasn't a sith, she was a dark jedi /sith acolyte, she wasn't even a secret apprentice, she didn't have the darth title and Dooku just used her as an assassin. After Clone Wars she became even more distant from the Jedi/Sith. She also wasn't of the sith race, she literally had 0 claims to calling herself a sith (not that she wanted to any way).

You can't just call yourself a sith just because you have a red lightsaber and some force powers, it's not as simple as that, read the Rule of Two (Darth Bane's novels)
Sacull_Kinslaye
7 years ago
And the rule of 2 that was violated by just about every Sith. Vader, dooku, even sidious. She was the Sith Tyrannus's apprentice. Trained in the Sith arts. By a Sith. Ahsoka was an apprentice. To a Jedi. Trained in the Jedi arts. By a Jedi. And she has the Jedi tag. Simple.
Sacull_Kinslaye
7 years ago
But it is a pointless argument. They do as they do.
Player_7ctrhms9
7 years ago
"Sacull_Kinslayer;c-1549734" wrote:
They do as they do.

Of course. As they can. And as you and I can. We all do what we do.

And yes, I do think the post was tongue-in-cheek to say the least. All good fun :smiley:
kato77
New Spectator
7 years ago
I think that all First Order characters should get empire tags because they are also evil dictators with big star ships. It’s unfair that they don’t.
Empiric1
7 years ago
"Sacull_Kinslayer;c-1549733" wrote:
And the rule of 2 that was violated by just about every Sith. Vader, dooku, even sidious. She was the Sith Tyrannus's apprentice. Trained in the Sith arts. By a Sith. Ahsoka was an apprentice. To a Jedi. Trained in the Jedi arts. By a Jedi. And she has the Jedi tag. Simple.

Sorry I don't agree. The SITH always had minions to do their bidding, you're not going to take over the galaxy with just 2 people ( even Palpatine and Plagueis), Ahsoka was an OFFICIAL member of the jedi temple, even a jedi knight officially. Ventress was at best Dooku's little assassin/servant and dirty secret that he thought Palpatine didn't know about, she was never officially recognised by Palpatine who was the only sith lord present at her time.
Yerff_Caasi
7 years ago
"Sacull_Kinslayer;c-1549733" wrote:
And the rule of 2 that was violated by just about every Sith. Vader, dooku, even sidious. She was the Sith Tyrannus's apprentice. Trained in the Sith arts. By a Sith. Ahsoka was an apprentice. To a Jedi. Trained in the Jedi arts. By a Jedi. And she has the Jedi tag. Simple.

Ahsoka Tano (Fulcrum) doesn't have the Jedi tag. Because she severed ties with the Jedi. The Ventress in-game was at the time that (as others have said) she had already severed ties with the Sith. So no Sith tag. Simple.
NomadCrest
7 years ago
"Ninjah9;d-169635" wrote:
I am seriously disappointed with the faction description of this character. She should definitely be labeled a sith, and be able to benefit from fighting with sith leaders abilities. This really goes against the canon of the storyline created by George Lucas. General Grievous I understand because he cannot use the force. But there is no legitimate reason not label Ventress a sith, she has held her own against and even bested several noteworthy jedi (including Kenobi, Anakin, Asokha, and Luminara), she can use the force, and was officially Count Dooku's apprentice. It's unfair, and possibly sexist that she isnt given sith attributes. How come male characters like Ezra Bridger and Kanan Jarrus can benefit from 3 factions (Jedi, rebel, and Phoenix) while Ventress is limited to only two. Are you saying only Male characters can have this benefit? Or that female characters all together aren't qualified enough to be a legitimate sith? I am offended by this and would like to see this correction made, or I will seriously consider getting the #metoo movement up in here, and file some official complaints. I expect better from Disney, and Lucasfilm!

She is more nightsister than sith bruv. Look at ATF. She can use the force and they don't have her labeled as sith. Or even JTR and it's even in her title as well but they dont have her role as a Jedi
ninjah9
7 years ago
The whole snapshot explanation is weak, I guarantee you there will never be another Ventress toon. Ventress absolutely is a sith, the comparison to Ashoka is spot on. And Ashoka fulcrum should be listed as a jedi too. My thought is the sith/jedi specials are shared because of light/dark powers of the force. So if they use the light/dark side of force they should benefit from those abilities. My main point is it makes characters more versatile and is justified by canon.And increases strong squad variation, making the game more fun. Another contradiction with Jarrus and Ezra is they have the jedi tag, not because they are officially part of the jedi order but because they utilize the force. Darth Maul and Savage disconnected from their sith masters, and they are still with. I think it would be cool if they benefited from being teamed up with the nightsisters.