"Kyno;c-2097149" wrote:
"AlexanderG;c-2097130" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2097127" wrote:
"AlexanderG;c-2097120" wrote:
Because people spend lots of time and / or money on characters and squads and would like to get to use them more than the game currently provides.
Staggering as that sounds.
They are saying that they want to focus on development of this exact thing, they just want to focus it on things that will have higher engagement.
A sandbox mode is not the only place to get this, as staggering as that sounds.
"They want" - how about actually DO and maybe the issue of a practice / sandbox mode will go away.
But hey, go ahead and judge the merits or otherwise of a sandbox given that we don't, and never have had, one.
so you think they should divert resources from developing something that will help in game development to something that will not further in game development?
lets say engagement will be the same, for the sake of this conversation.
I would like to know what resources have they put into the game development in the last year. Please tell me anyone who thinks this game has improved in any way over the last year. A sandbox mode as people want with no refreshes has no monetary value to CG. If they can't squeeze money out of players, they won't implement it. This is the way. Change my mind.
Capital Games Team
