"ImYourHuckleberry;c-1081485" wrote:
Look, I understand where most of you are coming from, but I disagree.
This game develops in stages, and maybe in this current stage chaze has more utility than any other duo, but there will be additional stages of toon deployment and development to follow. You see, it doesn't mean the game will always be this way. Remember 1st and foremost, CG is a business and has investors looking for a return on their investment, and power creep ensures revenue streams. What I take from this thread, is perhaps a word to CG, and even their investors, to not accelerate the power creep so fast. That seems reasonable.
Admittedly, chaze was a massive jump in the meta. But chaze is beatable, as I've shown in a thread in the feedback section under characters. Being somewhat of a counter meta guy, I like the challenge chaze poses to me. It's fun to come up with new ways to beat chaze (and rex) without using either.
Chaze has not broken the game, is not op, is not unbeatable, is not unbalanced . Just because the duo has great utility doesn't then mean they beat all strategy and is unbalanced. Many have already shown alternative comps that can beat chaze without using Chaze. Oh I know, I know, just because you can beat a team, doesn't mean the team is balanced. We'll, just because a team is unbalanced doesn't mean the game is broken or has insurmountable squads on the way to #1 in arena.
Only toons in the game to be in every meta since release are chaze and GK.
They have been dominant since release and chaze themself are a whole team of toons and it obviously shows since they are one of the only toons that have t been forced out of meta.
We don't need more power creep toons to be introduced to have the utility purposes like chaze or better than chaze because that puts the community in another chaze situation.
You haven't offered anything that OP hasent refuted or someone has already said for the 100th time about defending chaze
