Conquest Section 5 Darth Malgus section with Inquisitors

I have no objections to anything you are saying. The crux of the matter is whether CG should have told us they tweaked the node. For me, personally, I think it would have been nice to have been warned, but I'm not losing out on anything from the tweak. To someone that was skating by with even weaker Inqs, they may be very impacted by the withholding of information. I don't see why it's hard to empathize with them

"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2368508" wrote:
I have no objections to anything you are saying. The crux of the matter is whether CG should have told us they tweaked the node. For me, personally, I think it would have been nice to have been warned, but I'm not losing out on anything from the tweak. To someone that was skating by with even weaker Inqs, they may be very impacted by the withholding of information. I don't see why it's hard to empathize with them

100% they should have told us.

I'm not having an issue empathizing. I even gave tips for how to do it with low gear inqs, and have done so on Discord and Reddit as well.

Noticed something with Malgus on the bonus level as well, he goes down super fast, like a paperweight. I am able to get the kills with G9/10 3 * inquisitors.

"DMG_SW;c-2368505" wrote:

"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2368502" wrote:

Who said it wasn't working "right"?

Common sense said it wasn't working right. People complain about GLs getting outsped in Zone 5, but G11 inquisitors easily go first? It was clear that they messed up and didn't add the +90% stat bonuses that are supposed to be present at the end of Zone 5.

did you check the node at the end of zone 5 last time? It had no buffs or modifiers to it. So of course g11 inquisitors went first. The enemy last time was naked. CG explicitly said it was there to give you an experience with Malgus. But nowhere has it been stated or implied that it was incorrect by CG. Unless you want to argue CG isn't allowed to make a node with no modifiers on it.

Consider how easily Malgus gets nuked now on the bonus node when it has modifiers on it. That seems to indicate that CG intended the first conquest to work exactly as it did. In order to build hype for their new Conquest character.

Question is, did anyone not get bad batch on that node?

"MasterSeedy;c-2369155" wrote:
Just so people know, I did the final BadBatch node with solo SLKR.

They killed Malgus, but SLKR kept going and killed everyone himself. 3-stars despite losing Malgus (which I expected).

Why take other toons in if they're not strong enough to survive? Max the node with SLKR. I didn't even change my disks, so 2 slots were used by Zealous Ambitioni, but I did have (blue) Volatile Accelerator, Ability Exhaust, and (blue) thermals.

The point is to farm the 14times full inquisitor win.

I don't get it. Were is the problem? The Inquisitorious Feat can still easily be done on the HK boss node, even if they are undergeared and with low stars.

Btw...I also got BB this time on the node after Malgus.

Same. I was able to easily complete this feat during the last conquest but I can’t this time.

They probably "fixed" it (I'm glad I was farming the Old Republic feat just in case !)

Do you have a different team than you did last time?