8 years ago

# Credit Heist Eewards Sheme

Hello,

I always play the TIER 3 credit Heist battles. I still don't understand why EA/CG designed it so you can score lower rewards (e.g. $1.5M) in the Tier 3 battles than if you played the TIER 2 OR TIER1 battles. The higher tier battles presumably should always provide greater rewards than lower tiers.

The Tier rewards bands overlap significantly.

so basically, over time, isn't it theoretically possible that no matter - whether it's Tier 1, 2, or 3 - each Player can be receiving the SAME average payout of a certain amount like $2 M per battle, In other words, there is a cap on the rate at which we can accumulate rewards. T3s lower range ($1.5M) shouldn't be the mid-range of T2, should it?

I'm just waking up so I don't know if I'm calculating, communicating, evaluating this right.

I always play the TIER 3 credit Heist battles. I still don't understand why EA/CG designed it so you can score lower rewards (e.g. $1.5M) in the Tier 3 battles than if you played the TIER 2 OR TIER1 battles. The higher tier battles presumably should always provide greater rewards than lower tiers.

The Tier rewards bands overlap significantly.

so basically, over time, isn't it theoretically possible that no matter - whether it's Tier 1, 2, or 3 - each Player can be receiving the SAME average payout of a certain amount like $2 M per battle, In other words, there is a cap on the rate at which we can accumulate rewards. T3s lower range ($1.5M) shouldn't be the mid-range of T2, should it?

I'm just waking up so I don't know if I'm calculating, communicating, evaluating this right.