6 years ago
Crewless BTL-B Y-wing...
Q: Why is this ship crewless? CG_M: Unlike the droid ships which really don’t have a separate pilot, the BTL-B Y-wing would normally have had a pilot but we ended up not including crew. There was...
"Potato211;c-1998826" wrote:
You: The game is too grindy and bottlenecky
CG: *Announces two more ships that won't require us to grind a pilot alongside said ship*
You: WHAAAAAA LOREEEEEE
The game was never about lore and it has been said to death.
I mean for real? And then you complain whwn devs don't listen to us and it's because of this. People will always find a problem where there is none. You have a great fleet and impressive roaster? Good for you, **** like me who struggle with gearing up ships would probably thank CG for this decision. The fact that ships require pilots limits how many ships they can add without clustering the roster even more.
Bottom line: Crew less ships = More variety. Games evolve.
God, this is why we can't have nice things.
"Dinotank46;c-1998832" wrote:"CadoaBane;c-1998630" wrote:"AngelVazzana;c-1998621" wrote:"CadoaBane;d-217714" wrote:Q: Why is this ship crewless?
CG_M: Unlike the droid ships which really don’t have a separate pilot, the BTL-B Y-wing would normally have had a pilot but we ended up not including crew. There was a long discussion on whether we should include an older, well owned clone. In the end, we decided to make it easier to unlock by not requiring crew members from your collection.
Imho that was the wrong decision. I lost interest in this ship already before I had finished reading the whole post. This is completely out of lore in a way that would not be necessary, just for the little "benefit" of not gearing up another potential pilot. :(
Are you kidding me? Your actually complaining about them making it easier for us to obtain a ship without having to waste our most needed gear. Bro you need to just step back and evaluate your life and the way you look at things. Never have I seen people complain about a company trying to help them with nothing in return. FFS ignorance is bliss to some.
Whenever you feel the need to judge other people's lifes, I'd suggest to go home and rethink your own. ;) Back to topic: I am sure that players who always neglected their pilots will like the dev decision... but accept the fact that there are also players who enjoy having a benefit from stronger ships due to the pilots over others and relinquish gearing up other characters for exactly that reason. Crewless ships will turn mirror matches into nightmares, remember my words in a couple of months.
Do you realize how much time it takes to design a character. Just imagine it takes a long time to think up the actions the design and all of that. Plus also an update. So unless you would like to do all that. Go home and attempt to do all that.
I dare you
"UnbelieverInME;c-1999068" wrote:"SithVicious;c-1998970" wrote:"UnbelieverInME;c-1998892" wrote:
"It matches the survivability of Hound’s Tooth but also provide the Galactic Republic faction with something extra."
There's no point in having a "deep" fleet roster at the moment since there's no place to use them.
You currently need deep fleet roster for TW and now GAC will be using ships again.
I've never had to use more than 3 fleets in TW. I'll hold comment on GAC until I see how it's implemented, but the point being "at the moment" in my statement. . .
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.
78,062 PostsLatest Activity: 5 hours ago