I noticed in Division 3 that a few guys are getting a score of 720 due to deploying teams (corresponding to 8 teams deployed) while most people from Division 3 deploy only 6 teams (corresponding to a score of 540). Is this really meant to be this way or is this a bug? Isn’t it unfair that few people have an advantage of 180 points because they can deploy more teams, inside the same division? Shouldn’t everyone in the same Division deploy the same number of teams and get the same score from it? (Obs.: the guys with 665 have got 540 from deploying and 125 from the fleet arena feat).@CG_SBCrumb

I'm wondering the exact same thing, would love to hear the explanation especially since they said the goal is to climb the ranks based on your score

Yeah, same...I'm at 540 and despite doing all I'm asked, I'm losing...don't like it.

At first I was thinking those with 720 points in div 3 just were at the top end of our div, which I think they are based on total GP, so I figured I wouldn’t want to be matched up against them anyway, so let em have the extra points from having to set more D. Then I looked at some of their rosters and I’d love to fight them.Something is def wrong with this so far, hopefully they get it dialed in better during these exhibitions.

Divisions are based on total GP (character + fleet).But this squad-only GA is matched on character GP so we are going to see a lot of inter-Division matches.

"Thryss;c-1893091" wrote:"KirKanos82;c-1893077" wrote:"Thryss;c-1893035" wrote:Thanks for the info, but I believe you missed the fact that I said the numbers are estimates which was also reinforced by my use of “~”. This is interesting as it may indicate that is is more likely based upon character gp, but still does not change the fact that there is a imbalance of max banners within a division. I believe you missed my point entirely. I have lower total GP and lower character GP than my guildmates, significantly less, 300k for GP and 100k for character GP. However, they are deploying 6 teams while I deploy 8 teamsI did miss your point. Given the number of teams set on defense should be based upon the lowest of both opponents - Can you post / compare yours and the opponent gps? That might clarify it....else I dont have a good explanation on what is driving the difference. Cheers.Either way, the differences in banners within a division appeared to be an issue in fairness. Hoping CG will explain this.The character GPs of my 7 other opponents in this round are extremely close to mine, all around 2.318m GP.It is unfair to the others in my division who can only slot 6 teams into defense and attack 6 teams. My max banners will definitely be more than them although we are competing in the same division.

Division scores incorrect | EA Forums

noodlenoggins
6 years ago
I'm wondering the exact same thing, would love to hear the explanation especially since they said the goal is to climb the ranks based on your score
PDub_LJenkins
Rising Newcomer
6 years ago
Yeah, same...I'm at 540 and despite doing all I'm asked, I'm losing...don't like it.
ZapZapZipZap
6 years ago
At first I was thinking those with 720 points in div 3 just were at the top end of our div, which I think they are based on total GP, so I figured I wouldn’t want to be matched up against them anyway, so let em have the extra points from having to set more D. Then I looked at some of their rosters and I’d love to fight them.

Something is def wrong with this so far, hopefully they get it dialed in better during these exhibitions.
Rath_Tarr0
6 years ago
Divisions are based on total GP (character + fleet).

But this squad-only GA is matched on character GP so we are going to see a lot of inter-Division matches.
strawberry3ggs
6 years ago
"Thryss;c-1893091" wrote:
"KirKanos82;c-1893077" wrote:
"Thryss;c-1893035" wrote:

Thanks for the info, but I believe you missed the fact that I said the numbers are estimates which was also reinforced by my use of “~”. This is interesting as it may indicate that is is more likely based upon character gp, but still does not change the fact that there is a imbalance of max banners within a division.

I believe you missed my point entirely. I have lower total GP and lower character GP than my guildmates, significantly less, 300k for GP and 100k for character GP. However, they are deploying 6 teams while I deploy 8 teams

I did miss your point. Given the number of teams set on defense should be based upon the lowest of both opponents - Can you post / compare yours and the opponent gps? That might clarify it....else I dont have a good explanation on what is driving the difference. Cheers.

Either way, the differences in banners within a division appeared to be an issue in fairness. Hoping CG will explain this.

The character GPs of my 7 other opponents in this round are extremely close to mine, all around 2.318m GP.

It is unfair to the others in my division who can only slot 6 teams into defense and attack 6 teams. My max banners will definitely be more than them although we are competing in the same division.
TheDarkCrystalX
6 years ago
Yes this is completely unfair as those who get to deploy more defenses get an extra 360 total points from extra attacks and higher conquer too. Can never make top division if you have lower total points for a perfect score by 33%. Huge epic fail.
TheDarkCrystalX
6 years ago
"avins;c-1893282" wrote:
Really can't all of you complaining just wait 24-48 hours so you can deploy the other 3 teams against your second opponent, and get the feat reward??? please use your brain before talking about unfairness.

I think avibs you dont get it. This has nothing to do with feats it has to do with fairness of rewards and promoting. You cant promote as high if you are compared to someone who had the potential to earn 33% more points than you for an arbitrary reason.
sublime828
6 years ago
Easy solution is to set the deployment points for each division and the amount of squads that have to be placed. For example, a division 2 player who has to place 6 squads for a total of 540pts(90pts per placement). The deployment for another division 2 player is 8 squads. Just adjust the points for deploying eight squads (67.5 instead of 90) so the total for full deployment is the same across the board. If it truly suppose to be an equal playing field across the board having players get a leg up just for being higher gp is a big flaw in their global system.
austin09370
6 years ago
If you can't deploy the max, you aren't the best. Working as intended.
frtm25
6 years ago
"Austin9370;c-1892753" wrote:
If you can't deploy the max, you aren't the best. Working as intended.

All the guys that have a 720 score so far are a bit over 3.8M GP. Seems like they went above the 3.8 cutoff between Divisions 3 and 2 after the Division snapshot, at the start of the championship, but before GA round lock. Seems like, in GAC, the cutoff for the number of teams deployed is 3.8M. This way these guys are deploying like everyone in Division 2, but are competing at Division 3. This benefits everyone that is right under the cutoff and goes higher than it after the Division snapshot and everyone else is in disavantadge. It is unfair, in my opinion.