Forum Discussion
575 Replies
"Heretosay;c-2287260" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2287251" wrote:
"Heretosay;c-2287247" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2287245" wrote:
"MaricSkywalker;c-2287240" wrote:
Have we gotten confirmation this is working as intended from the community manager yet?
No, and from my understanding they may be looking at things, but waiting on an official statement to that effect. (But I make no promises or anything of any sort of official thing of this statement)
I'm baffled they have beta testers I watch streamers accidentally reveal things all the time. This shouldn't be missed. I'm sorry if there is an unintended interaction with 2 really odd ships that's understandable, but this is the current meta.
You are jumping to conclusions, but that can be natural without actual knowledge of the situation.
Maybe we can just leave the speculation about the beta group out of this and provide some constructive feedback about the ship and the issues you have/see.
It shouldn't be speculation that the NEW OP ship was tested on against the current meta...
The speculation is placing blame, without any knowledge of the system that goes on in the background. It is also no constructive to the conversation on any level."Mirkraag;c-2287262" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2287251" wrote:
"Heretosay;c-2287247" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2287245" wrote:
"MaricSkywalker;c-2287240" wrote:
Have we gotten confirmation this is working as intended from the community manager yet?
No, and from my understanding they may be looking at things, but waiting on an official statement to that effect. (But I make no promises or anything of any sort of official thing of this statement)
I'm baffled they have beta testers I watch streamers accidentally reveal things all the time. This shouldn't be missed. I'm sorry if there is an unintended interaction with 2 really odd ships that's understandable, but this is the current meta.
You are jumping to conclusions, but that can be natural without actual knowledge of the situation.
Maybe we can just leave the speculation about the beta group out of this and provide some constructive feedback about the ship and the issues you have/see.
Sorry but he is right.
Dev actually teased ("sell") the ship as the next meta literally.
This ship has been beta tested. Two options : one is that they missed the point that the ship has a terrible AI in defense (so equivalent to not be beta tested at all). Option 2 CG was lying about the fact that it will be the next meta.
2 options, which one is the good one that I dont know.
Again, you can assume what you want, but no there are many many more options than that for what could have happened.
Assigning blame based on no knowledge of what happened doesnt help and is no way constructive. Please keep it constructive and provide feedback about the ship."AlexanderG;c-2287266" wrote:
"Borat;c-2287264" wrote:
"Mirkraag;c-2287262" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2287251" wrote:
"Heretosay;c-2287247" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2287245" wrote:
"MaricSkywalker;c-2287240" wrote:
Have we gotten confirmation this is working as intended from the community manager yet?
No, and from my understanding they may be looking at things, but waiting on an official statement to that effect. (But I make no promises or anything of any sort of official thing of this statement)
I'm baffled they have beta testers I watch streamers accidentally reveal things all the time. This shouldn't be missed. I'm sorry if there is an unintended interaction with 2 really odd ships that's understandable, but this is the current meta.
You are jumping to conclusions, but that can be natural without actual knowledge of the situation.
Maybe we can just leave the speculation about the beta group out of this and provide some constructive feedback about the ship and the issues you have/see.
Sorry but he is right.
Dev actually teased ("sell") the ship as the next meta literally.
This ship has been beta tested. Two options : one is that they missed the point that the ship has a terrible AI in defense (so equivalent to not be beta tested at all). Option 2 CG was lying about the fact that it will be the next meta.
2 options, which one is the good one that I dont know.
My 7* has sat in #2 for 4 hours now and has caused many of my shard mates fits (i sat in 2 as to not block them but wanted them to test as I am the first to have it) so not sure if it is my modding and extra relics or they don't have strong fleets but either way, this ships should not be beaten by Raddus or FO that easily. Next we will see someone do it with Mace. Watch.
So it's holding well then and your shard mates cannot beat it?
so far but now I am in 1 as my PO is coming up. I will see what happens for the next few hours until the next PO in my shard. But again, it might be because of my R7 IG, Cad, Bando, and Bossk, R8 Boba and Piet. They all have 6E mods or better and all zetas. Fleet GP of 593000- My shardmates handled it easily with every fleet out there. If it’s holding elsewhere maybe those people just don’t have as good of ships or aren’t as good with them.
"Rhydia;c-2287279" wrote:
My shardmates handled it easily with every fleet out there. If it’s holding elsewhere maybe those people just don’t have as good of ships or aren’t as good with them.
7* Exec? I know that plays a role on easy of defeat. If yes, then you may be correct that they don't know how to use them or they are not strong fleets. Too early to really tell. I do start HT, RC and IG front 3.- ZanirN7S5 years agoSeasoned AceTVF's salt salts my caramel. That's all I wanted to say.
"Borat;c-2287282" wrote:
"Rhydia;c-2287279" wrote:
My shardmates handled it easily with every fleet out there. If it’s holding elsewhere maybe those people just don’t have as good of ships or aren’t as good with them.
7* Exec? I know that plays a role on easy of defeat. If yes, then you may be correct that they don't know how to use them or they are not strong fleets. Too early to really tell. I do start HT, RC and IG front 3.
Everything I have is maxed. Even my IG88 is R8.- TheMortalLobster5 years agoSeasoned NoviceMeh! What is this snake oil you have sold me. 7* Executor, with a crew member with no mods to slow it down - was this really what we were promised. It’s embarrassing CG and needs to be fixed, this is far from dominating.
"fraser119;c-2287287" wrote:
Meh! What is this snake oil you have sold me. 7* Executor, with a crew member with no mods to slow it down - was this really what we were promised. It’s embarrassing CG and needs to be fixed, this is far from dominating.
i love it the way it is :D- i Genuinely feel like CG have scammed me out of money on this. The way they went about advertising this fleet is just wrong.. non of it is true. Its so easily beaten its unreal.
Featured Places
SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.Latest Activity: 39 minutes agoCommunity Highlights
- CG_Meathead8 months ago
Capital Games Team