GA Fairness: Community Help
Hey all, Just a thought for how the community could help offset matchmaking disparities. If you are a notably larger account and outgun your opponent- attack first. This would drastically ...
Forum Discussion
"AlexanderG;c-2364653" wrote:"ImaSmakya;c-2364647" wrote:"Rath_Tarr;c-2364646" wrote:
I think most players would care more about the uneven matchups than who moves first but what would I know, I'm just a bottom feeder in low end Kyber 1 beating opponents with more GP/GLs about 60% of the time by attacking when I'm ready.
I’m more than a million gp less than you and ranked about a thousand spots higher in K1 and I always make sure I go second and run about an 80% win rate. Clearly going second is a distinct advantage, I like when they go first and try to scare me with a full clear.
/s for the inevitable anecdotal evidence warriors.
You won / win because you have the roster that enables you to. That would still be the case if you went first.
Unless you think going second provides some hitherto unseen bonuses for your characters or puts a hex on your opponent.
It’s not hitherto unseen, it’s simple math most of the time. In most cases, I don’t have the roster to stop the opponents I’m getting from getting a full clear, so it comes down to efficiency.
The case below, my opponent went first and full cleared me with less than stellar efficiency. Having seen that I knew that I didn’t have to one shot his Exec in my final battle. I only had to clear the zone so I could safely send in a burner fleet beforehand. If that info was not available, there is a very high chance I would have failed as I would have tried to one shot it and we all know what the success rate the Mal counter has now that they have “fixed” buzz droids.
